Titanic compared to modern-day liners.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

PaulB

Legendary Member
Location
Colne
Bit of a difference there, you think?
 

Attachments

  • Titanic.jpg
    Titanic.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 39

rugby bloke

Veteran
Location
Northamptonshire
Its probably just me but I cannot help seeing modern day cruise ships as absolute monstrosities. But then again I've never been on one so I'm only speaking from my default position of ignorance and bias.
 
This image amazes me. I never thought about it from that perspective. The cruise ship behind the titanic is HUGE. I've never been on a cruise ship but the idea sure does sound appealing to me. One day!
 

Mad Doug Biker

Just a damaged guy.
Location
Craggy Island
I would much rather sail on the Titanic than the modern day floating apartment blocks. Titanic's tragic fate apart, obviously.

You could have sailed as far as Cork like one lucky Priest/Minister did (people forget that once leaving Southampton, the Titanic then stopped at Cherbourg and Cork, before heading west).
He was to go to from Southampton to New York, but got called back at the last moment at Cork, therefore surely avoiding a watery grave.

He also took pictures on board which are now considered historical as, well, how many other pictures taken onboard the maiden voyage survived?

All in all, a very lucky man!
 
Last edited:

GrumpyGregry

Here for rides.
[QUOTE 4367402, member: 259"]Yebbut the Titanic was a liner, the fastest way across the Atlantic, not a poncy cruise ship.
Ahem..[/QUOTE]
Got to the draw before me. The march of technology is relentless.

Here is a Titanic era state of the art aeroplane

upload_2016-7-15_15-53-56.png


Airbus A380 anyone?
 

Mad Doug Biker

Just a damaged guy.
Location
Craggy Island
Got to the draw before me. The march of technology is relentless.

Here is a Titanic era state of the art aeroplane

View attachment 134958

Airbus A380 anyone?

Is that a picture of Ryanair's newest plane?
 
There was a lot of the Titanics volume taken up by the stuff that kept it moving, boilers, engine room, coal bunkers. I suspect there is less % taken up by modern ships machinery (despite more amenities and stuff like massive air conditioning plant, kitchens, sewage treatment and the like) leaving more room for cargo.
Modern crews more likely to be serving drinks than shovelling coal now too.
 
Top Bottom