If an Ofo is similar to the Dutch bike you rode, then both were very different to mine! The Cambridge Ofo I rode was a heavy lump with a low riding position and I think harsh alloy frame and solid tyres.
Yeah, contrary to what someone posted above, I'd go for a forgiving steel frame on a Dutch bike rather than aluminium every time.
Well, of course there were differences but the broad strokes were extremely similar:
- Both are very heavy (the ofo is around 16-17kg, I'd estimate the town bike to be similar or even more)
- Both have an extremely upright riding position / short reach, high stack that's comfy and forgiving but terrible for drag at speed and in headwinds; I think a max effort on the flat on either got me around 17-18mph, when it'd be high-20s on a road bike.
- Both have internal hub gears and gripshift; the ofo only 3-spd the town bike was 8-spd so better in this regard but still limited in terms of range and spacing compared to 2x10 or 2x11 setup
- Both have wide-ish tyres of around 35-40mm
- Both have big fat saddles
You make good points about the ofo you rode; however mine has been fettled so now has a proper-height saddle (was about 3" too low before and bloody horrible for it) and decent pneumatic tyres. Obviously steel would be nicer but the bulk of the compliance comes from the tyres and now they've been changed the ofo doesn't feel harsh in the slightest.
I kept the ofo for the same attributes as one would seek in a town bike (weather resistance, convenience, comfort, low maintenance). Generally it's great as a short-distance (ideally sub-10 miles) utility bike as long as you have no intention of going fast and can endure the effort required to get up hills and overcome headwinds.
So I stand by my original post based on the (very similar) experience of both bikes