When I played any tackle above the waist wasn't banned per se, but was regarded as ungentlemanly and unseemly, and it largely didn't happen. Now they're like the footballists, grabbing any anything they can lay their hands on.
Had this discussion with my SiL, who is an ex pro and now semi pro union player (ie, he still gets paid to play but not enough to live on.) I played at inter club level in the 6th form and very briefly at town league level as a young man, and we both agree its a contact sport and we willingly took our chances. If you fancy a sport but don't want to be worrying about the physical consequences in later life then there are plenty of alternatives to choose from.
Reopen this thread to allow it to continue in its usual friendly fashion.
its a contact sport and we willingly took our chances. If you fancy a sport but don't want to be worrying about the physical consequences in later life then there are plenty of alternatives to choose from.
That's a reasonable point of view, particularly at an amateur level. It gets codified into law as a thing called violenti non fit injuria. Willing participants do so knowing the risks. That's why Graham Rowntree can't have any complaints about his cauliflower ears, or my late father about his multiply broken nose or "frozen shoulder" injury. They are par for the course when choosing to play rugby.
But there are limits to this, and the authorities do have a duty of care, especially where there is employment involved.
This blog has some interesting comments on the Steve Thompson case and the legal ins and outs of it.
https://www.sportlawmusings.com/general-3
And this is worth reading, just because it is.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/shontayne-hape-my-battle-with-concussion/CGBEXHZROCMNKPAD5BYKPBAL5Y/
Without reading that blog post, AIUI, the general legal position is that consent of the "victim" is a defence against charges of assault up until the point where the assault causes Actual Bodily Harm. Anything which causes Actual Bodily Harm or above cannot be consented to.
But there are, of course exceptions for recognised sporting activities, reasonable surgery, and a few others.
Rugby League have followed Union in lowering tackle height, one of 44 measures to be introduced to make the game safer incl. reducing head to head contact.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/67658523
no doubt will be a few teething issues as it rolls out but a good thing going forwards.
The reason RL Players tackle above the waist is to prevent the player being tackled from passing the ball before the ball carrying arm hits the floor, thefore being deemed as tackle complete, which from the few RU games I've seen doesn't seem to be the case as they don't have the 6 tackles & a hand over rule.