classic33
Leg End Member
Often in the early days they were no lines, bar the goal line at either end between the posts.let's get rid of the white lines then ======l
Often in the early days they were no lines, bar the goal line at either end between the posts.let's get rid of the white lines then ======l
put a few landmines in to make it fun(ier)So an unlimited field size then…..seriously
They have to be within these limits.So an unlimited field size then…..seriously
They have to be within these limits.
Maintaining the aspect ratio.
View attachment 669866
There is no minimum line thickness either, only a maximum of 6".
Often in the early days they were no lines, bar the goal line at either end between the posts.
They only came in when the rules were drawn up in a garden shed in Sheffield. The pitch size, and markings, were a Hull "invention"/decision.How early we talking here???? And how would you know if the ball went out for throw ins or corners???
They only came in when the rules were drawn up in a garden shed in Sheffield. The pitch size, and markings, were a Hull "invention"/decision.
Basically it's a Yorkshire game.
The pitch has to be within the limits given above, and the widest line can be no more than 6", still relevant today.But we are still talking 1863…….and not relevant at all to the current game and the issue of japans goal on tuesday.
The pitch has to be within the limits given above, and the widest line can be no more than 6", still relevant today.
So were you.But you were talking about the day when there was no line markings……which is irrelevant.
You love a confusing post dont you.
So were you.
Nowt confusing, you just need to follow what's been posted.
Last 16 decided....
So whose gonna win it...???