The CycleChat Helmet Debate Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

benb

Evidence based cyclist
Location
Epsom
This is a common argument, just because they are tested at that speed doesn't mean they may not work at increased speeds. How do any of you know how a particular helmet will fair at higher speeds? And MTB helmets are often much more robust with extra coverage coming down the sides and at the back ^_^

Well if standards don't bother testing helmets performance at higher speeds, you certainly can't claim any protection at those higher speeds.
 
...
  • United Kingdom 34% ...

Pity there isn't anything more up to date than this 2008 figure
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
Pity there isn't anything more up to date than this 2008 figure
I think I've seen a London main-route count that's more recent, but still shows only a minority using helmets, but I can't find that again right now. It seems highly unlikely that helmet users are a majority here when they don't seem to be anywhere without cycling-reducing helmet-forcing laws or severe official promotion, doesn't it?
 

Glow worm

Legendary Member
Location
Near Newmarket
I'm pretty sure I've quoted this one before, if you'd bothered to search the thread: latest helmet usage rates by country, extracted from ETSC PIN Flash 29 Table 15 "Helmet wearing rates for cyclists":
  • Austria 30%
  • Denmark 28%
  • Estonia 31%
  • Finland 41%
  • Germany 15%
  • Ireland 46%
  • Latvia 12%
  • Poland 12%
  • Sweden 37%
  • United Kingdom 34%
  • Serbia 1%
  • Israel 14-27%
  • Norway 49%
  • Switzerland 43%

I have suddenly developed a liking for Serbia ^_^
 
Yes, I understand that perfectly well. The bit I don't understand is why that concerns you so much.

It's more like idle curiosity rather than a major concern.
 

Justinslow

Lovely jubbly
Location
Suffolk
Crash simulation shows helmet protection
brain%20crash%20simulations%20320.jpg
6 April 2016.
Research at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden has shown that bike helmets can reduce the risk of concussions by 54 percent, and drastically cut the risk of skull fractures.

The findings are based on computer-simulated reconstructions of bike crashes in which the riders wore no helmet and sustained head injuries.

Researchers can now apply advanced kinematics to real injury data from medical databases and build advanced crash reconstruction and simulation models.

Remarkably the study showed that helmets would reduce the chance of skull fractures by 98 per cent.

Strain in the brain tissue, which is associated with brain injuries, was reduced by up to 43% for the accident cases studied when a helmet was included.

This resulted in a reduction of the risk of concussion of up to 54%. The stress to the skull bone went from fracture level of 80 megapascals (MPa) down to 13–16 MPa when a helmet was included and the skull fracture risk was reduced by up to 98% based on linear acceleration.

Even with a 10% increased riding velocity for the helmeted impacts, to take into account possible increased risk taking, the risk of concussion was still reduced by up to 46% when compared with the unhelmeted impacts with original velocity.

KTH neuronics researcher Madelen Fahlstedt says the simulations of the crashes—and their impact on the brain—drew upon data from the U.S. National Institutes of Health Visible Human Database, which captures the complex behavior of soft tissues.

"Together with researchers in Leuven, Belgium, we have recreated kinematics of three bike accidents where riders lost control of the situation, fell and hit their head," Fahlstedt said.

"We captured the cyclists' movements during the accidents and then applied the kinematics in terms of speed, just before the blow to the head, on a detailed computer model.”

To assess the impact on the brain, the researchers compared the results of their simulations with CT images, in which bleeding was evident in the brains of the crash victims. Then, they conducted simulations with and without helmets to see what would happen.

"We can see how much the brain tissue is stretched in the collisions, and that the tissue is stretched most in those areas where the impact occurred," she said.

"We saw a great reduction of stress on the bones, as a result of wearing a bike helmet, from 80 megapascals down to 10 megapascals. This figure indicates how much load you put on a given surface, and translated into more understandable terms, this means a reduction from 100-percent risk of skull fracture down to 10 percent for those wearing helmets.”

The researchers said there had been some controversy regarding the effectiveness of helmets in preventing head injuries among cyclists.

Epidemiological, experimental and computer simulation studies have suggested that helmets do indeed have a protective effect, whereas other studies based on epidemiological data have argued that there is no evidence that the helmet protects the brain.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of a helmet in single bicycle accident reconstructions using detailed finite element simulations. The results of this study show that the brain injury risk and risk of skull fracture could have been reduced in these three cases if a helmet had been worn.

Madelen Fahlstedt et al. The protective effect of a helmet in three bicycle accidents—A finite element study, Accident Analysis & Prevention (2016).
 
Top Bottom