mickle
innit
- Location
- 53.933606, -1.076131
Adapters are never as good as something that doesn't require adapters. In the case of forks, while you can use an adapter on a normal fork built for rim brakes realize to that a fork built for disk brakes has the entire length of the leg reinforced not just near the dropout at two attachment points which is all the adapter is going to do, after prolonged use of a disk brake with a fork that only has an adapter you increase the odds of the fork failing. The same is true for the rear stay. In my opinion using an adapter is mickey mouse. When a disk brake is applied the front fork will twist a bit toward the rotor side, on road bikes, due to making them as light as possible, even disk brake forks are seeing more twisting, this isn't as evident in more stout bikes but even with mountain bikes they still had to reinforce the forks; this twisting thing is also one of the reasons why there is more issues with spokes breaking.
https://www.velonews.com/2017/04/bikes-and-tech/technical-faq-disc-brake-wear-fork-twist_434593
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/myth-12-disc-brakes-work-better-than-rim-brakes/
Now having said all of that the original poster said the brakes were be put on a touring bike to which I must assume he tours on. Touring in developed countries having disk brakes is not an issue should you need parts, but in third world countries finding parts for a disk brake system could be a huge issue; a V brake, or cantilever brake is much more simpler and parts would be easier to track down. Also with disk brakes if you're rotor gets bent you'll probably be walking, and if you're in a third world nation when that happens you will be walking for quite a ways.
Not an adaptor, a braze-on.