mjr
Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
- Location
- mostly Norfolk, sometimes Somerset
Coming out with a 96% usage figure when the last official statistic was something like 36% (many years ago now, before they stopped collecting it - but from what I've seen, I suspect the % has fallen since then as numbers of casual cyclists increase) suggests something is off, doesn't it?I wear a helmet and I'm definitely not a racer. Not sure how you draw the conclusion that it is skewed to certain types of riders by whether or not they wear a helmet. And yes, we all know about the safety debate.
It's only the red man or man+bike lights where a cycleway crosses a road which are advisory. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/14/part/1/paragraph/9/made says they are a "should not", not a may not, must not or an offence to ignore. This was first brought to my attention when I complained to the council about the horrendously poor signal timings at a local junction.[...] I've also never heard of red lights being described as advisory, but am eager to learn more about this piece of info.
Not really, if it's not sound evidence. Then if it's used, it'll produce slightly-wrong stuff that doesn't quite meet the needs and it's very debatable whether that's a step forwards or not (as we've seen often in the past...).I do agree with you on your last point however. In any event, isn't the most important thing about this report that it can be used as evidence to drive better cycling infrastructure and improve cycle safety, rather than semantics?