scotsbikester
Well-Known Member
I've got an Abus Granit XPlus 540 which I is diamond graded for pedal cycles.
When I lock my bike up, it is usually in a location I consider relatively secure. I leave my lock at the place I lock the bike. However, as angle grinder attack seems to be the current "serious" method of theft, I was thinking of upgrading to either one of the really heavy duty chain locks aimed at motorcyclists:
https://securityforbikes.com/products.php?cat=High+Security+Chain+and+Lock+deals
or possibly one of the two "angle grinder clogging" D locks:
https://hiplok.com/product/hiplok-d1000/
Litelok X3
Both of those get very good reviews, after real tests, in terms of how much they slow down an attack with an angle grinder. Like 5 minutes, plus several angle grinder discs, compared to 30 seconds or so for the Abus. I haven't seen any test attacks on a chain.
Here's the thing. All three of the options above are in the £250 region. My bike's insured, and I'm fairly sure that as long as it's locked with the Abus, I'd be covered.
Although utter security is attractive, is there any evidence to demonstrate that super-duper security actually puts thieves off? What I mean is, if they have a go, and write off a £250 lock, then I'm buying another one of those (I think "accessories" might be covered up to £250).
I suppose what I'm asking is, if I'm paying for insurance, and I comply with the terms of that insurance (Yellow Jersey, BTW) in terms of where and how I lock it, is it just a silly waste of money to go even further in terms of security?
And I suppose at the back of my mind is a slight worry of losing the lock key, or the lock being damaged or vandalised in some (as yet unknown) way which means I can't actually remove it. So a very secure but still defeatable lock might actually be preferable.
Thanks.
When I lock my bike up, it is usually in a location I consider relatively secure. I leave my lock at the place I lock the bike. However, as angle grinder attack seems to be the current "serious" method of theft, I was thinking of upgrading to either one of the really heavy duty chain locks aimed at motorcyclists:
https://securityforbikes.com/products.php?cat=High+Security+Chain+and+Lock+deals
or possibly one of the two "angle grinder clogging" D locks:
https://hiplok.com/product/hiplok-d1000/
Litelok X3
Both of those get very good reviews, after real tests, in terms of how much they slow down an attack with an angle grinder. Like 5 minutes, plus several angle grinder discs, compared to 30 seconds or so for the Abus. I haven't seen any test attacks on a chain.
Here's the thing. All three of the options above are in the £250 region. My bike's insured, and I'm fairly sure that as long as it's locked with the Abus, I'd be covered.
Although utter security is attractive, is there any evidence to demonstrate that super-duper security actually puts thieves off? What I mean is, if they have a go, and write off a £250 lock, then I'm buying another one of those (I think "accessories" might be covered up to £250).
I suppose what I'm asking is, if I'm paying for insurance, and I comply with the terms of that insurance (Yellow Jersey, BTW) in terms of where and how I lock it, is it just a silly waste of money to go even further in terms of security?
And I suppose at the back of my mind is a slight worry of losing the lock key, or the lock being damaged or vandalised in some (as yet unknown) way which means I can't actually remove it. So a very secure but still defeatable lock might actually be preferable.
Thanks.