Hacienda71
Mancunian in self imposed exile in leafy Cheshire
- Location
- Wilmslow, Cheshire
The Spencer Davis Group, The Small Faces, The Yardbirds, John Mayall's Blues Breakers.
Fair comment but many bands who came in after in the pre and post 2000s did not and have not endured like these have.Should the title of the thread not be "So who's the best band if you gave up on listening to new music some time in the 80's"?
TBF the 2000s were a horrendous decade for what you might call conventional guitar music. But since I guess the 80s with technology improving and getting cheaper, music production has become more democratised and whole new genres are appearing all the time. I do wonder if now that recording, sampling and synthesising has become so cheap and easy that we're missing out on the innovation which comes from exploring the limitations of what's possible with the equipment at your disposal but I guess we'll see.Fair comment but many bands who came in after in the pre and post 2000s did not and have not endured like these did.
Should the title of the thread not be "So who's the best band if you gave up on listening to new music some time in the 80's"?
Not that there's anything particularly wrong with the bands mentioned so far, or liking them.
I'm sure there will be a forum, or more likely a FaceBoak page somewhere, discussing the merits of Ed Sheeran, or Blur v Oasis; but I haven't found it yet. And if I do, I won't be hanging around for long!It's utterly beyond me how this forum doesn't attract a younger membership.
Should the title of the thread not be "So who's the best band if you gave up on listening to new music some time in the 80's"?
Not that there's anything particularly wrong with the bands mentioned so far, or liking them.
Blur v Oasis, apart from being utter nonsense, was twenty five years ago...I'm sure there will be a forum, or more likely a FaceBoak page somewhere, discussing the merits of Ed Sheeran, or Blur v Oasis; but I haven't found it yet. And if I do, I won't be hanging around for long!
It still falls into the era in which music lost it's way, and has never recovered.Blur v Oasis, apart from being utter nonsense, was twenty five years ago...
No tribute bands please! 😁Oasis, nuff said !
I think he could be right. I saw the Stones live twice in 1982. I was swept away by 'fan hysteria', but on hindsight I found them to be average. Jagger and Richards as we all know wrote some great songs, but live, to me it's more of a show with necessary backing musicians than an actual 'great performance'.After Paul McCartney said the Stones are just a “ blues cover band” Roger Daltry (age 77) has now claimed the Jagger fronted line up are a “ mediocre pub band” and if you heard their music coming out of a pub you’d think thats “a mediocre pub band”.
So, what do you think? Is that true or did the contemporary bands of that era like Pink Floyd, The Animals, Led Zeppelin have more to offer musically?