Show us your.......newbie progress!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Well seeing she is not on here.......bet you wouldn't have the courage to have said that! :tongue:
My oh keep threatening to sign up as well, but doesn't fancy having his wife moderating his posts to start off with. Then there is the problem of what to call himself... On CGOAB he is StraightOnSaysSatNav but is considering Mr SNSSO instead for here!
 

Mo1959

Legendary Member
My oh keep threatening to sign up as well, but doesn't fancy having his wife moderating his posts to start off with. Then there is the problem of what to call himself... On CGOAB he is StraightOnSaysSatNav but is considering Mr SNSSO instead for here!
How about MrBreakEverythingITouch :laugh:
 
Not having Strava Premium I have been looking at the two other measure in place of Strava's suffer score
For the last 20 or so rides looked at Strava Plus's Toughness Score and Cycling Weekly's Ritmo score

The toughness score (higher the tougher) went up to 473 for the New Forest 100 Sportive, next was the group ride with two decent hill, the pace was quite high, so I am not surprised. This week's hilly ride was next at 182. It does seem to give a bigger score when a tough ride is longer

The Ritmo score is much less affected by distance and I think is more a measure of fitness, and the lower the better
My overall Ritmo score has gone down from 22ish to 16
The New Forest 100 Sportive was 14.1. but most recent rides between 18 and 22

I was trying to decide which to use as a guide but decided they are both good in their own way
 

Mo1959

Legendary Member
Not having Strava Premium I have been looking at the two other measure in place of Strava's suffer score
For the last 20 or so rides looked at Strava Plus's Toughness Score and Cycling Weekly's Ritmo score

The toughness score (higher the tougher) went up to 473 for the New Forest 100 Sportive, next was the group ride with two decent hill, the pace was quite high, so I am not surprised. This week's hilly ride was next at 182. It does seem to give a bigger score when a tough ride is longer

The Ritmo score is much less affected by distance and I think is more a measure of fitness, and the lower the better
My overall Ritmo score has gone down from 22ish to 16
The New Forest 100 Sportive was 14.1. but most recent rides between 18 and 22

I was trying to decide which to use as a guide but decided they are both good in their own way
I use Ritmo too just for a bit of added interest.

The Garmin was playing up this morning :sad: Took a while to pick up satellites then half way through the ride it briefly lost signal. Part of the ride uploaded to Garmin Connect says it was in 2017..........I'm not that fast that I can time travel. Lol. I have put in a request to Strava support with the file to see if they can correct it. No matter if they can't. It was a pleasant ride anyway.
 
I use Ritmo too just for a bit of added interest.

The Garmin was playing up this morning :sad: Took a while to pick up satellites then half way through the ride it briefly lost signal. Part of the ride uploaded to Garmin Connect says it was in 2017..........I'm not that fast that I can time travel. Lol. I have put in a request to Strava support with the file to see if they can correct it. No matter if they can't. It was a pleasant ride anyway.
time travel is now possible, but only with Mo. Please tell me, was I..... no I had not better know, I might alter the time continuum and change things....:laugh:
 

Tomtrumps

Active Member
http://app.strava.com/activities/219362007

My first ride on the new CAAD8 this morning. Tried a familiar after work route to compare to my hybrid. Having not ridden for three months and the traffic being a bit heavier than the evening, very happy to say the ride was quicker than usual! And clipless for the first time with no trouble. So much better and highly recommended to those that are considering! Happy, happy days! Not going to break any records on Strava segments just yet though...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom