I am struggling as to why folk refer to being concerned, as stalking and invading privacy etc,
@raleighnut hits the nail on the head , many of us would not have known about vernon if it wasnt for friends of his, and yes i mean friends, not anonymous bods behind a keyboard.
Your confusing the 2 issues there. Nothing wrong with being concerned, but hunting out private addresses and phone numbers even where he lives could easily be mistaken for stalking and invading privacy... Im struggling to understand why this is acceptable. You haven't personally as far as im aware roadrash but it has seemingly happened... The forum webmaster/moderators almost certainly have access to his IP addresses and could easily find his personal address and therefore his welfare, but there are rules and laws that have to be adhered to.
Have folk considered that he doesn't want to be contacted?
I never met Vernon, but have seen some of his posts and he seemed like a popular and entertaining guy. But it was an act of luck that people got to know what happened to him. If people choose to leave instructions to contact forum members on what happens if the worst should happen, then that's fine, of course. But is it reasonable to spread concerns to potentially harassing families from what is nothing more than a social media platform and afaik, a bunch of faceless nobodies turning up on the doorstep?
There could be many reasons why Screenman has gone radio silent and he may have been ill, that still doesn't mean the worst. I too hope he is OK. But the simple fact is, we may never know. Which is what happens on 99% of social media platforms. No one really has a instant right to know, unless you personally know them, the family or has given you strict instructions of what to do if they go missing.
I don't mean to upset anyone and no malice ever intended and hopefully he posts soon...