Obviously if you're not trying to prove anything, then threads like this should be of no interest. For instance, I'm sure there are still people around who believe the earth is flat, because they don't know any better.
the Earth IS flat if you live in cheshire.
cut cut cut cut cut cut
the existence value and feelgood factor of new wheels and their contribution to the biodiversity of aesthetic tastes justifies selection and purchase of new wheels as surely as any physical modelling does, as far as im concerned. it also helps the economy and supports green transport and promotes cycling in general.
Square onesSo what are the best wheels to get again ?
So what are the best wheels to get again ?
I suppose I must be really dumb, but, as far as I can tell, this thread appears to suggest that cheaper heavier wheels are faster.
You give yourself far too much creditThat's quite an impressive, wholesale misunderstanding of the thread content, if that's what you really think. I'm hoping not.
That would hardly constitute a reliable experiment. Too many variables and no controls.
Well, that's obvious, innit?Depends how you go about it...
Wheels don't actually have to be circular....
the issue of 'plagiarism' can be solved easily enough. Simply copy a block of the 'offending' text written above - and then run it through google. If google gets any hits on it with links other than to this site, then there's your answer.
So what are the best wheels to get again ?
That is what I call an exact science