snorri
Legendary Member
- Location
- East coast, up a bit.
You just get a feeling deep inside.Yeah, but how do you know a pleasing sight when you have no point of reference?
You just get a feeling deep inside.Yeah, but how do you know a pleasing sight when you have no point of reference?
Then a COCKWOMBLE I must be as I have in the past ( and maybe will in the future) hopped the curb to avoid a set of lights.
Is there a special badge I need to wear?
It's all fun here, in some neighbourhoods bikes are banned from the pavement, in some banned from the street. In the 10 mile ride to work and if I wanted to stay legal I would have to switch from road riding to pavement riding 4 times.Nah - different rools for Tek-suns.
I'm all for people being educated in the error of their ways but I wouldn't make a habit of squirting water at a stranger, it could back fire on you and end up in fisty cuffs. Them scousers can be well 'ard like
Was a bloke on here whose location said Liverpool. He got shirty with some driver and punched his car. The driver chased in his car, got out a beat the cr8p out the cyclist.
The cyclist came on here to tell others not do the same.
Yes, I have noticed that tooIf i could aford a horse, i would't have a bike.
PS i have noticed that bike police spend most of there time (all of there time) on pavements!
LikewiseHmm...I do this sometimes.
Mind you, the 'pavement' in question is actually a shared ped/cycle lane. Then I rejoin the road!
There must be more pleasing sights to look at on your way to work?
It's all fun here, in some neighbourhoods bikes are banned from the pavement, in some banned from the street. In the 10 mile ride to work and if I wanted to stay legal I would have to switch from road riding to pavement riding 4 times.
I just led two other riders across a pedestrian area to cut out a snarled-up junction.
It felt wrong but I should point out that I was leading 2 young (18 and 20) Canadian relatives who have never ridden road bikes before, we'd got turned away from Lewisham Station on the way out, cycled across town to Victoria station only to be barred entry onto the train, and were returning thoroughly defeated when the traffic snarled up. The little detour used to be a road but it was changed not because of cyclists but because of heavy motor traffic. I believe it was safer for them - we were not in a rush - and I don't believe cyclists should ever have to endanger themselves in heavily congested traffic when the alternatives have been removed by officious and totally unnecessary Olympic bans.
For the safety of my young companions. It would have been what I'd describe as advanced cycling anyway. The alternative was a pedestrianised road that had only been changed because of heavy traffic. Perfectly safe, and responsible ride leading even though it was illegal. (Though looking at google maps it's only marked as no entry for cars and motorcycles so perhaps it was only a lack of cycle-friendly signing rather than illegal as such.here.)I have to say, cycling in the USA is "different".
I've only had a weekend of it - and that was in and around Irvine, CA - supposedly one of the most bike friendly cities around, and frankly I didnt enjoy it overmuch even then.
If you were not in a rush - why break the law ?