You're right, of course, but I think we're getting (hope we're getting) to a stage where powers above and around the UCI will be demanding reform and will be looking for demonstrably clean, competent, honest and professional people to take the reins. If the current shower can identify such people from among their ranks, that may be acceptable, otherwise, ultimata may be issued.Until they change the process for electing the president of the UCI, there will be little change, I fear.
Too many vested interests/ hangers on/ spongers, IMHO. Now, why does that remind me of the IOC ???
Until they change the process for electing the president of the UCI, there will be little change, I fear.
Too many vested interests/ hangers on/ spongers, IMHO. Now, why does that remind me of the IOC ???
Dignitas ?So... any more suggestions now the UCI has accepted the USADA findings?
Yes I can see the logic and I think the threat should be there but...They're beyond reform. "We're not as rich as FIFA (so we can be bought by anyone's cash)". The pro teams and fans need to breakaway and start afresh. Now how the hell does anyone do that?
In some ways I don't think Thompson's idea is so crazy. The UCI needs to face some sanctions. Who is the UCI's governing body? Where is their power devolved from?
As an addition, is it correct that there is only one female delegate at the UCI? (out of 41)