Red Light Jumping

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE 1526176"]
Just more attempts to ignore a completely relevant question. Look up the page to see yourself ignoring your interpretation of the personalisation issue. The question remains...

Did you stop running red lights when you discovered it was illegal?
[/quote]

Ok aside from it clearly being contrary to the rules laid down by the moderator how is it relevant to the topic subject.
It may be relevant to your own twisted agenda but as i have previously advised i am not willing to fuel your personal attacks on me.
 
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE 1526179"]
And, what do you think are the benefits of ignoring red lights?
[/quote]

What do you think are the benefits of ignoring red lights?
 
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE 1526181"]
The question is asked of you. So....
[/quote]

So are you asking me a question you are not willing to answer yourself ?
 
A

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
Location
Cwmbach, South Wales
apollo179 said:
I fail to see how my personal behaviour has any to a relevance to the discussion of the designated topic.
Please explain.
You say previously " You've got a view on RLJing. You're withholding some information, which shows that you're not being open and that you have an agenda which you're reluctant to share. I'm interested in getting to the bottom of this view of yours. It's not an attack on you, but a drilling into your opinion. Exposure of all information would show a different picture to that which you're trying to paint."
Why are you so obseessed with my view and my agenda ?
I started this topic to discuss the issue of rljing not my own personal habits.
Im not painting any kind of picture.
Your drilling is inappropriate - please understand.
My views are pretty well aired - im generally not one to hide my views but in the present arena it is not appropriate.
The Moderator specifically told us "Debate the issue, but don't make it personal."
+
You have already stated on this topic ; "I said that I didn't believe your claim that you only rlj at completely deserted junctions. Because that's not true. "
So its apparent that you have already asked your own question , answered it for yourself and made your mind up.
Your mind seems to have been made up before you asked the question.
So really when your mindset is clearly so narrow and so inflexible - whatever answer i give you will clearly beleive what you want to anyway.
Click to expand...

I will try and explain. In the beginning you didn't know RLJ was illegal so you did it. Now you know it is. The question therefore is has the knowledge changed your actions?
 
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
Angelfishsolo said:
I will try and explain. In the beginning you didn't know RLJ was illegal so you did it. Now you know it is. The question therefore is has the knowledge changed your actions?
Click to expand...

Yes (between you and me it has).
However
The moderator said "This thread will remain unlocked as long as posters can remain civil with each other. Debate the issue, but don't make it personal."
I hope you can see that i want to keep to the moderators rules and not make it personal.
 
Moodyman

Moodyman

Legendary Member
apollo179 said:
Yes (between you and me it has).
However
The moderator said "This thread will remain unlocked as long as posters can remain civil with each other. Debate the issue, but don't make it personal."
I hope you can see that i want to keep to the moderators rules and not make it personal.
Click to expand...

Not quite. We all know now.
biggrin.gif
 
A

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
Location
Cwmbach, South Wales
apollo179 said:
Yes (between you and me it has).
However
The moderator said "This thread will remain unlocked as long as posters can remain civil with each other. Debate the issue, but don't make it personal."
I hope you can see that i want to keep to the moderators rules and not make it personal.
Click to expand...

I am glad to read that. Thank you.

I am certain that the mods meant not calling name et al when they said don;t make it personal and not "have your actions changed since you learned..." Otherwise any poll on behaviour would be personal.
 
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
Angelfishsolo said:
I am glad to read that. Thank you.

I am certain that the mods meant not calling name et al when they said don;t make it personal and not "have your actions changed since you learned..." Otherwise any poll on behaviour would be personal.
Click to expand...

"Debate the issue, but don't make it personal." Moderator.
I interpret this literally.
Polls are personal but anonymous so are not so susceptible to becoming acrimonious.
"Did you stop running red lights when you discovered it was illegal? " is imho personal.
Anyway Mr Paul has displayed a predisposition to abuse me personally so i am suspicious of his motivation.
 
A

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
Location
Cwmbach, South Wales
apollo179 said:
"Debate the issue, but don't make it personal." Moderator.
I interpret this literally.
Polls are personal but anonymous so are not so susceptible to becoming acrimonious.
"Did you stop running red lights when you discovered it was illegal? " is imho personal.
Anyway Mr Paul has displayed a predisposition to abuse me personally so i am suspicious of his motivation.
Click to expand...

Oh please!

Anyway we have the answer to one question :smile:

What benefits can be found in ignoring Red Lights? (General question not aimed at you.)
 
OP
OP
apollo179

apollo179

Well-Known Member
Good question - i will think and get back to you.

Whatever else - i do try and view issues in a multidimensional perspective rather than the blinkered way some around here seem to - not you i hasten to add.
Thats why i asked the original question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom