Bike police are both more cost-effective and more effective at policing, in many built-up areas. It's a great advance.
You'd think an "alliance" of "taxpayers" would be all in favour of cycle police being well trained, then, wouldn't you?
I can't imagine what it must be like to try to pull over a white-van or a truck for dangerous driving, if you're on a bike yourself; and you surely need to be very familiar with all the footways and cut-throughs possible to a pedestrian, so that you can give chase if need be; and you need to know how to get through snarled-up traffic quickly and safely at speed, to get to the scene of a road-traffic incident. Just a few good reasons for a manual.
The whole complaint is a carefully-orchestrated propaganda drive by some of the 13 paid employees of the private company calling itself Taxpayers Alliance - "partners" of the Drivers Alliance which is the same outfit under a more accurate hat.
The TPA, for anyone who still doesn't know, is NOT an alliance and is not a group of taxpayers. It's a limited company of professional far-right lobbyists, whose chief exec doesn't even pay UK tax, and which is wholly funded by the road-construction, haulage and car-manufacturing industries.
The more modal share claimed by cycling and walking, the more business these stand to lose - in road construction, if the government does what it says it intends, that should mean billions less in contracts and in public subsidy. They are fighting tooth and nail to firmly fix "acrive travel" as looney, trivial & antisocial in the minds of the public.