Pointless & impractical vehicles

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

classic33

Leg End Member
61551-4d1820b3849fec79cc240e8843d3f4be.jpg
 

Gunk

Guru
Location
Oxford
Ladies and Gentleman, I give you the Suzuki X-90. probably the most pointless production vehicle of the 1990’s


IMG_1663.jpeg
 
Ladies and Gentleman, I give you the Suzuki X-90. probably the most pointless production vehicle of the 1990’s


View attachment 756507

Not really. Thanks to their short wheelbase, they are a popular choice for trials, both in standard spec (my mate Simon competes in one, albeit not this year) or upgraded with a 2 litre engine, as does multiple UK trials champion , Nick Deacon.

https://shop.simonlewis.com/blogs/theres-gold-in-them-hills--falcon-trial-march-4th-2023

And if you want weird & whacky, check out the Super Robin in the above blog... :laugh:
 
Ladies and Gentleman, I give you the Suzuki X-90. probably the most pointless production vehicle of the 1990’s


View attachment 756507

Sadly a real vehicle, not even photoshoppped, or 'AI'!!
 

presta

Legendary Member

raleighnut

Legendary Member
Perhaps, but is anyone allowed to use them on the road?

Well the original cars had to be* so I would assume so.

* All 'Le Mans' cars had to be not only legal but road registered too as the roads were only closed for the race, they also had to carry a spare wheel and have 'luggage space'. Even the Ford GT40 had 'luggage space' although they pushed the regulations to the limit with where they put it (2 trays either side of the gearbox that also helped with aerodynamics with the 'spare' wheel in between)
 
Top Bottom