Pointless & impractical vehicles

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Profpointy

Legendary Member
They did it to the Z3 and created a classic, of course.

And of course the Volvo 1800. The Saint had the saloon model but estate equally cool
E69E40A3-0878-4AE7-B12A-41CA3464A2DF.jpeg
 

T4tomo

Legendary Member
And of course the Volvo 1800. The Saint had the saloon model but estate equally cool
View attachment 708821

that is neither pointless nor impractical...the finest "shooting brake" ever made
 

classic33

Leg End Member
Right, just been nerding with my motor racing historian friend on the subject of 6-wheeled F1 cars. Here are the results of the combined Cambridgeshire and Gloucestershire juries:

The Ferrari 6-wheeler is genuine. That ran de Dion suspension to accommodate an arrangement like on the pre-war ERA and Auto Union hillclimb cars. Was only ever tested though.

Lotus never developed a 6-wheeler at all.

The March 6-wheeler is genuine, but it never turned a wheel in anger on a circuit until it popped up in historics recently. It was used for hillclimbing in the early 80s though.

The eight wheel Ferrari is a photoshop construct.
The eight wheeled Ferrari was a mock up built to divert attention away from their Indycar project for Andretti.

1696501646716.png
 

T4tomo

Legendary Member
The March 6-wheeler is genuine, but it never turned a wheel in anger on a circuit until it popped up in historics recently. It was used for hillclimbing in the early 80s though.

Apparently the hill climb one wasn't one of the prototypes 761-2.4.0 that were tested but not raced as the adapted gearbox required was too unreliable / too expensive to make reliable (but apparently the car had excellent grip), it was a later March 771 but with the better of 2 prototype gearboxes borrowed from March bolted on to give the 2.4.0 configuration. Used for a season with a mixture of success and reliability issues, and the reverted to 4 wheel configuration.
 

Gwylan

Veteran
Location
All at sea⛵
I nominate our local bus.
It slips back and forth through the space-time continuum ignoring the rules of time in our dimension
It is almost totally invisible. Most often the rear is sighted moving away from observers anxious to be teleported or just ride on it.
It gives the impression that it does not exist in our space phase. Or only in a temporal or illusionary sense.

Has amazing properties to redefine itself and it's ultimate goal seemingly at random. This results in it following no prescribed routes and certainly not those defined by the timetable.
Bus number assignments change in transit resulting in a 400m + walk if you arrive at the other re-entry point.
As mentioned photos are hard to find.
 
Apparently the hill climb one wasn't one of the prototypes 761-2.4.0 that were tested but not raced as the adapted gearbox required was too unreliable / too expensive to make reliable (but apparently the car had excellent grip), it was a later March 771 but with the better of 2 prototype gearboxes borrowed from March bolted on to give the 2.4.0 configuration. Used for a season with a mixture of success and reliability issues, and the reverted to 4 wheel configuration.

I'll run that past the Gloucestershire jury. I can't comment, as hillclimbing is not my area of expertise, but Si is knowledgeable, as he's competed in and knows a lot of people around the sport.
 
Yep, further research and asking around has proved the 8-wheel Ferrari is a complete and utter fabrication.

The Indycar project was conceived in 1985. Designated the 637, it was designed by Gustav Brunner, who later owned and ran the Eurobrun F1 project in the late 80s. The car was tested at Fiorano by Michele Alboreto.
 
Apparently the hill climb one wasn't one of the prototypes 761-2.4.0 that were tested but not raced as the adapted gearbox required was too unreliable / too expensive to make reliable (but apparently the car had excellent grip), it was a later March 771 but with the better of 2 prototype gearboxes borrowed from March bolted on to give the 2.4.0 configuration. Used for a season with a mixture of success and reliability issues, and the reverted to 4 wheel configuration.

And the answer is in. The Gloucestershire correspondent says the following:

He's right about the March it was a different chassis to the works one that appeared before the cameras (with only 2 of the 4 wheels actually being driven as the transmission would not stay together) it ran about half a season in 1979, one event win I think and too many breakages so it reverted to 4 wheels . March did make a lot of money from this design as they flogged the model rights to Scalextric!
 

T4tomo

Legendary Member
And the answer is in. The Gloucestershire correspondent says the following:

He's right about the March it was a different chassis to the works one that appeared before the cameras (with only 2 of the 4 wheels actually being driven as the transmission would not stay together) it ran about half a season in 1979, one event win I think and too many breakages so it reverted to 4 wheels . March did make a lot of money from this design as they flogged the model rights to Scalextric!

I can confirm the Scalextric was like the 1st works version - only 2 driven wheels!
 
Top Bottom