Podium girls neither please nor offend me. I'm with Raindog, each to their own and nobody forces them... It's a pointless thread ....
This, and other posts along the same lines, are rather missing the point. Of course the women are free to take that job if they wish. My problem with podium girls here, and in other sports, is the message it sends out to young girls, about what they will be valued for.
This may have no effect (hopefully), but it can also lead to many girls not achieving their potential at school because it's not cool for girls to be good at (say) physics, for not trying at sport because they'll get all sweaty and not look nice, for not considering many careers because 'girls don't do that', or they may have to wear some kind of uniform that doesn't look good, and even (as someone pointed out above) to the lack of coverage of women's sport and the consequent difficulty of being a professional cyclist (for example) because there is not enough media interest.
Now before someone jumps in and says that podium girls don't cause all that - of course they don't, on their own. They are a symptom of a still-pervasive sexist attitude in society. We have come an awful long way in the last century, but equality in law needs to be followed with equality in attitudes, and getting rid of the podium girls (or having both men and women present the flowers/cuddly toys etc) would be a small step towards that.