Podium Girls

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

ColinJ

Puzzle game procrastinator!
And we haven't even touched on the symbolism of all-conquering heroes spraying podium girls with champagne ... :whistle:
 

resal

Veteran
OK well now that it's over perhaps we can get back on topic. The Podium "girls" convention is demeaning to women, insulting to men, idiotic and infantilising, and unworthy of the sport. It proclaims that men do stuff and women are for decoration and for the approbation of men's achievements. It values women only for looking nice and behaving like good little girls. It objectifies women, and validates men's right to look at and judge them, and (as we have seen recently) touch them or subject them to unwanted sexual attention. It trivialises women's cycling by implication. It is discriminatory. It perpetuates inequality. It validates men's right to look at and judge women, and (as we have seen recently) to touch them or subject them to unwanted sexual attention. It is patronising to the winning cyclists. Get rid.
This is an excellent post. The only thing it misses out is the fact that the sport of cycling has an attitude to female competitors that has, as a product, everything cultivated by this kind of treatment. Other sports have it, but most decent sports do not. Certainly no sports I would watch with my daughter or wife display this offensive attitude - only the big prizes for the men - women can just do the warm up act, sometimes, if they are lucky, but they can appear on the big day.......
.......... as soft porn decoration.
 

Radchenister

Veteran
Location
Avon
Perhaps our house is the exception to this view then, I respect it as a view but we don't find it offensive and I have canvassed everyone here - my 6 year old says they're a bit silly and she wouldn't want to be one ... so that's fine by me.
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
(edit - I meant to quote rich p, but I'm posting from an unfamilar and extremely irritating device)

To be fair, people have pretty much said all that at various points upthread already. But they kept getting told to "lighten up". If you put it all together it becomes clear that the practice is entirely indefensible, and that all the "arguments" in its favour amount to is an angry backlash and an attempt to hold on to power over women. The podium "girls" convention ought to go the same way as The Black and White Minstrel Show, for very similar reasons.
 
You seem to think her reasoning makes her wrong? See that's the problem or the answer, she's the podium girl, not you! So whatever she does is right to her? There's loads of other subjects where people put in there monies worth, trying to get things changed etc,without actually asking the people at the center of the matter.
As to symbolism..lol..don't make me laugh. You really think that everyday people are going to be bothered about the "Symbolism?" making a mountain out of a molehill comes to mind! You may as well make all women wear the burkah in case a man finds them attractive! Oh hang on that's also oppressing women....what next? We could all dress the same and shave our heads? Become as "Asexual" as humanly possible? Would that be ok? We are supposed to be different and if one woman wants to express herself one way shouldn't be down to the likes of your goodself to tell her she's wrong?
Sorry bit of a rant but to be honest, do-gooding (insert worst expletive) really get my back up.

As to the Sagan incident, the smug barsteward should have been smacked in the face, end of. maybe even sued for assault (no pun intended).

No, you seem to think I think that.
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
Perhaps our house is the exception to this view then, I respect it as a view but we don't find it offensive and I have canvassed everyone here - my 6 year old says they're a bit silly and she wouldn't want to be one ... so that's fine by me.

She clearly has her head screwed on. But it's not about whether you find it offensive- it's about the corrosive effects of inequality. What if she wants to be professional a racing cyclist? What if she grows up and the men she meets treat her as a thing and not as a person? What if she is regarded by others as an accessory to the achievements of men?
 

bianchi1

Legendary Member
Location
malverns
She clearly has her head screwed on. But it's not about whether you find it offensive- it's about the corrosive effects of inequality. What if she wants to be professional a racing cyclist? What if she grows up and the men she meets treat her as a thing and not as a person? What if she is regarded by others as an accessory to the achievements of men?

She might be gay and like looking at podium girls!
 

resal

Veteran
Well, it certainly caused a deal of opinions to be posted, and now I know that I'm a mysoginist (sorry but I actually LIKE ladies) and that taking PEDS is OK by me (which is a gross misrepresentation) both courtesy of Resal, who is perfectly entitled to stae opinions and I support that right to do so. In the same way I support a right to vehemently disagree with the peculiar "logic" employed.
But never mind, the thread brought out some fascinating attitudes.
By the way, quite a few podium girls I know have degrees, so the bimbo argument is a bit stale.
I married one a long time ago, and she's bright, sparky, intelligent (degree again) and supported me brilliantly for many years. It was a choice for her to do the job simply for the good money to help through qualifications, but if the job didn't exist she would have found something else. She can't help (still) being great looking, after all, and it's done no harm to her career in business.

Oldroadman - these were your words @ http://www.cyclechat.net/threads/yates-and-de-jongh-also-booted-from-sky.116462/#post-2124533

"How quick are the majority of posters to condemn, when we are talking about history which happened before some were even out of school, in what was a very different world. People had mouths to feed, no excuse I know, but often the team domestique rider (average pro career maybe 4 years) needed to make what he/she could to try and secure a better future than a job in a factory."

So I think many would offer a translation to that as: " it is ok to cheat and rob others (this dumb idea that doping is a victimless crime is moronic) to avoid working in a factory. No excuse I know but can't you just understand it. I would do it if I was in their shoes ! "

Sadly, just as it appears you wanted to excuse Yates, presumably because you spent so many years admiring him, rather than recognising what was so obvious, for so long, to so many, as his past links makes it nearly incredible to believe he did anything other than rob and cheat others of their livelihoods, like the rest of his buddies on US Postal and elsewhere, you want to excuse the attitudes you have harboured for many years, during your engagement in cycling towards females, in their use as decoration to men in a man's sport.

I know of a young girl who helped me out with some youngsters for a few months in some very worthy work. She worked, during her undergraduate days, as a lap-dancer. I was very saddened to learn of this. She had access to funding, far greater than I had when I was an undergraduate and did not need to demean herself to that extent. She took a view that , why work for many hours stacking shelves or some such other minimum wage activity, when she could earn more in a few hours at a night club. There was some bizarre logic she offered (something of the style oldroadman would not doubt approve) about how doing this gave her more time to study and so she could get a better degree. Just think about the next step in that chain, shelf stacker, podium girl, lap dancer, ......... . She got a degree. Maybe she will marry one of her punters ? Perhaps he will write in 30 years time about the form of his partners mammary glands and how their preserved shape and their exposure at critical moments, has enabled her to advance through ( a male dominated ) life, to her advantage.

All of this is just a sad reflection on those who have managed our sport for the last 20 or 30 years. Someone will no doubt be able to recall the idiot UK promoter in the 1970's who hired a bunch of girls to ride topless on bikes. We desperately needed to move from that position to one matching say, triathlon. Certainly those at the top in the last 10 or so years have done very little.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom