Thanks again all - looks like this thread is yielding some great information
130mm spacing came in with 8 speed, so there were a lot of steel frames out there from builders large and small. I have (just checked) 6
and only one of these is less that 25 years old
Thanks - although sadly I can't seem to find any! It seems that (according to Wikipedia) Dura Ace became 8sp in 1988, then got STIs in 1990 with, it seems everything else getting them by 1993 (which I think was when they reached 105). When do we reckon the mainstream builders went off steel? I've seen a few steel Raleighs with STIs from the mid-late 90s, however this was when they were well past their best it seems so nowt really worth having here.
I guess I have a window of maybe 1990-2000 (or a bit less) where I might find a decent steel bike with 8+ speed STIs.. can you recommend any decent British frame builders I might look out for?
Italian frames are often dripping with chrome. This looks good and is practical on chainstays but:
- it had better be in good condition, as rechroming is ruinously expensive
- it can embrittle steels and is best avoided on the very thin tubesets like EL
- you need an old-fashioned steel enclosed-cam QR if you have horizontal chromed dropouts. Something newer, even 6500 Ultegra, will not hold as there are alloy so-called biting surfaces in the acorn nut and the lever, which slip on chrome.
Thanks - must say I'm partial to a little bit of chrome and appreciate its wear properties in the right places; allthough have read about the hydrogen embrittlement you mention - probably a good case for it on the dropouts if not any of the tubing..
Thanks for the heads-up about the QR situation - didn't know that!
Italian tubing, handbuilt in Stockport.
Went with UK rather than a Colnago (same price) as this was being fitted with the latest Shimano Dura Ace 8 speed. Can't be doing fully Italian frames with Japanese kit.
View: https://flic.kr/p/2mQguSv
Very nice
I hear you on the Italian groupsets - as much as (on paper) I prefer Shimano, it does seem wrong on an Italian bike.
My memories from when steel racers were mainstream is that “Italian Stallions” as some owners insisted on calling theirs were regarded by most as a bit posey, all chrome and fancy paint but not as good as British underneath. Remember His Holiness Pope Cino Cinelli himself gave an interview to the Comic in which he said he would prefer to use Reynolds 531 to Columbus, but the import tariffs made it uneconomical, this was before Columbus bought Cinelli and the EEC abolished trade barriers across Europe. Eddy Merckx himself somehow got 531 tube sets to be built into his personal frames By De Rosa, just as later Miguel Indurain got some of his Pinarellos built in 653. The rifling in some Columbus tubing was widely regarded to be a marketing gimmick.
Thanks - I think you've hit the nail on the head - really I guess I'm asking if they live up to their reputation as I know from other interests in which I'm more learned I'll avoid some brands that others seem to blindly worship for their image..
It's interesting that you mention the "rifled" tubing (let's not forget Reynolds also did this with 708, although it didn't last very long) as I can't see how this can be any better than tube of the same mass with a slightly thicker wall. I wonder if it's perhaps more resistant to buckling somehow...?