vickster
Legendary Member
Yes. Why? Would you expect something different?
Remember - the majority on here are cycling enthusiasts (by most people's standards).
I don’t have a main bike really
Yes. Why? Would you expect something different?
Remember - the majority on here are cycling enthusiasts (by most people's standards).
Like most hobbies, it costs what you are prepared to pay. But in most cases, the more enthusiastic participants will get more out of it from better equipment - up to a certain point.
£10K bikes are only really noticeably better for those who are at a fairly serious competitive level - but of course some want (and can afford) "the best" even if they don't need it. And if that is what they enjoy, why not?
Others seem to take a perverse pride in paying virtually nothing, only buying second-hand and doing bikes up for as little as they can.
Most of us fall somewhere between those two stools. While there will be people on here who have never spent more than £3400 ona bike, and others who will have that £10K bike, I would expect the majority of us on this site to have a "main" bike which cost somewhere between £1200 and £3000. And that we expect to last us for quite a few years.
Others seem to take a perverse pride in paying virtually nothing, only buying second-hand and doing bikes up for as little as they can.
Why would it be perverse to buy a cheap bike and use it for very little money?
Bonzobob beat me to it, but why is this pride "perverse". That is as judgemental as saying someone takes a perverse pride in spending as much as they can possibly afford for a bike.
The pride involved in owning a bargain bike that the individual has bought and spent time doing up into a good-to-ride bike is no more perverse than buying a brand new expensive bike built by the manufacturer/retailer.
I have had huge pleasure, and some pride, although I hope not a perverse pride, in owning three bikes that I ride frequently and which cost me less than £1000 in total compared to a new cost of £5000. I enjoy riding all these bikes and I am sure I would have been even more pleased, possibly proud, if I could have got them for even less.
To me, it is somewhat perverse to take pride in anything you buy. But more so to take pride in either the fact that it was expensive OR the fact that it was cheap.
It certainly isn't (as Bonzobanana suggested) perverse to want to do things cheaply, or to enjoy getting very good value. It just seems a little perverse to me to take pride in doing so.
Again, taking pride in turning something which had been neglected into something good is not in any way perverse - that is taking pride in what you have done.
I have absolutely no idea why that might be perverse. Why are you asking that, since I can't see anywhere it has been suggested.
This thread has suffered more drift than a blizzard in the Highlands.
I see Pat sharpening her little chopper
Like with every hobby - cycling is full of people that will tell others how they should enjoy it. There are many 'high budget' cyclists that look down on people getting used bargains. Equally, there are about as many 'low budget' cyclists that will look down on the other group. I personally don't give a toss whether your bike cost £100, £1.000, or £10.000. Do what you please with your own money.
You suggested it up thread....
Like most hobbies, it costs what you are prepared to pay. But in most cases, the more enthusiastic participants will get more out of it from better equipment - up to a certain point.
£10K bikes are only really noticeably better for those who are at a fairly serious competitive level - but of course some want (and can afford) "the best" even if they don't need it. And if that is what they enjoy, why not?
Others seem to take a perverse pride in paying virtually nothing, only buying second-hand and doing bikes up for as little as they can.
Most of us fall somewhere between those two stools. While there will be people on here who have never spent more than £3400 ona bike, and others who will have that £10K bike, I would expect the majority of us on this site to have a "main" bike which cost somewhere between £1200 and £3000. And that we expect to last us for quite a few years.
"Others seem to take a perverse pride in paying virtually nothing, only buying second-hand and doing bikes up for as little as they can."
This thread has suffered more drift than a blizzard in the Highlands.
I see Pat sharpening her little chopper