Hi, sorry to jump in on this thread (first post), but I am thinking of getting either the D30 or M30 and I was wondering, based on you experiences, Scaleyback and Storck, whether you think the carbon frame is worth the extra over the alloy framed D30. I am a "young" 45 year old but have back issues that prevents me from putting maximum power through the pedals. I always struggle up hills because of this and find that on my Carbon Trek Emonde (8kg) I only average 15-16mph on flattish rides (far worse on hills so I avoid them!), hence why I am looking at an Orbea Gain. I do not ride in groups or clubs, only on my own or with a couple of friends. Fitness is not an issue - I am a runner and can run 41 minute 10ks and 1:34 half marathons, but cycling is proving problematic. Any advice would be gratefully received.
For me Southern I decided to wait for the carbon version. Not necessarily to have a lighter bike, but purely for comfort. Over the decades I've owned many Steel, Alloy and Carbon frames bikes. I recall the Vitus 979 coming out and purchasing one. Having ridden both the Alloy and Carbon Gains, it came as no surprise the M version is smoother and more compliant on the road. This is the usual case. That said I will be ordering a D version for winter riding, with it's ability to take mudguards (something to consider) With you having back problems, I believe you would find the M Gain more suitable, for your situation?