Heh. Did you see that interview where he said it was right he wasn't mentioned amongst the contenders anymore. It's like his head is two years behind everyone else. It surprises me he's still in contract.you forgot to mention Andy Schleck there
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
smutchin
Cat 6 Racer
- Location
- The Red Enclave
I've long tried to cling to the belief that Wiggo and Froome are professionals who can put personal differences aside for the good of the team. Guess this proves me wrong once and for all.
The fact that Wiggo wasn't picked for the Dauphiné was a massive hint (presumably that's the team that will start the TdF), but I kind of hoped his omission was a more strategic decision. Shame. The choice of team leader for the TdF is a no-brainer but Wiggo in current form would have been a very useful domestique for Froome.
This story is non-news but at least it clears up any lingering doubts.
The fact that Wiggo wasn't picked for the Dauphiné was a massive hint (presumably that's the team that will start the TdF), but I kind of hoped his omission was a more strategic decision. Shame. The choice of team leader for the TdF is a no-brainer but Wiggo in current form would have been a very useful domestique for Froome.
This story is non-news but at least it clears up any lingering doubts.
the_mikey
Legendary Member
- Location
- South Gloucestershire
oldroadman
Veteran
- Location
- Ubique
Then you wake up to the real world....
Hont
Guru
- Location
- Bromsgrove
Wiggins seems to clarify that further down the article. He means if Froome is fit and healthy to ride the tour and doesn't fall off between now and then.
BrumJim
Forum Stalwart (won't take the hint and leave...)
- Location
- Selly Oak, Birmingham
FTFY
Georgem123
Active Member
to be fair, froome is the better rider,, froome could have won in .2012 but was called back on numerous occasions to help Bradley
also the 2012 course was quite time trial heavy which played into wiggos hands
also the 2012 course was quite time trial heavy which played into wiggos hands
tug benson
Survived the Tour O the borders 2013
- Location
- Alloa
he's done fine without Wiggins so far
Hont
Guru
- Location
- Bromsgrove
Oh god. Can you imagine the endless "Would Wiggins have Won" hypotheses if Froome doesn't.
raleighnut
Legendary Member
- Location
- One of the 'Elite'
Quite. doesn't bear thinking about does it! BTW good luck Chris
Rob3rt
Man or Moose!
- Location
- Manchester
Could have, should have, would have... but didn't....
Georgem123
Active Member
well,, he couldnt , because team sky told him not to
Spoked Wheels
Legendary Member
- Location
- Bournemouth
Exactly. I felt, watching Wiggo's interview just a few weeks ago that he was ready to play the supporting role this time just as Froome did 2 years ago. Something must have happened since that interview, maybe Froome's book, who knows?
I don't know much about pro cycling but I feel that Froome is the more complete rider of the two and Wiggo couldn't have won the TDF without Froome. Wiggo has certainly gone down in my estimation with his attitude, he owes Froome a favour.
EDIT:
I've just watched the interview on BBC and it seems this is Sky call rather that Wiggo's in which case it would be wrong of me to say that Wiggo has gone down in my estimation.
Last edited:
Dogtrousers
Kilometre nibbler
Well, he wouldn't. Cos there aren't enough TTs. BUT ... the "would Froome have won with Wiggins in the team" hypotheses could be more heated.
Could be interesting. Probably won't happen, but I rather hope it does.
Spoked Wheels
Legendary Member
- Location
- Bournemouth
I think you know that is not so simple. There were teams orders. I still remember when Froome was called back and stay with Wiggo when Froome could obviously go faster than Wiggo. it was later explained that the strategy was for Wiggo to win the tour, nothing else was important. Cav left Sky because of that, with Sky, the emphasis was to win tours not so much individual races.
