busdennis
Guru
Have to agree with the cross bike fans here.
Cross bikes are the most flexible and useful of bikes. Put road tyres on them and they are fast road bikes - I competed in a triathlon on mine in the summer and I don't think I could have gone any faster on any road bike I could have got for the same money short of an out and out TT bike and even then it would have been marginal.
Swap the tyres for 35mm knobblies though and you're off into the woods going pretty much anywhere an mtb will go... just quicker - and you can get it back on the roof without giving yourself a hernia.
Or, you can put something in between on them for the commute to protect yourself from the potholes without spending too much energy bending rubber on knobbly tyres.
I find road tyres tramline much too easily for comfort or safety when it gets gravelly or sandy so if you are planning to ride on mucky and uneven country roads, a cross bike would be ideal.
Performance wise I'd have to agree with Norm. As I said I did a triathlon on mine (I took it seriously but I'm not any kind of elite competitor) and it flew. I did though spring for a carbon framed cyclocross bike so (a) it's no heavier than the most of the sub £2000 road bikes I was competing against and (b) I was using pretty much the same gear train or better too.
I wouldn't have done it with my 35mm cross tyres on though. I don't switch wheels - someone told me that the gears and the chain bed themselves into each other so swapping wheels can lead to uneven wear and slippage - I just change tyres. At this time of year the cross tyres stay on most of the time. In summer it's the road tyres but they get swapped over in ten minutes if I'm going off road.
I do like the flexibility. For example I wouldn't take a road bike around Rutland Water - there are bits it just wouldn't cope with - but a cross bike eats that kind of track for breakfast. I don't really see why people don't buy more cross bikes. My frame is no less aerodynamic than other carbon framed road bikes I see at the same price - it just has more clearance around the forks and cantilever brakes so (a) I can get the chunkier tyres on and (b) it doesn't get clogged up with mud.
If you can afford two bikes then I might have a cross bike and an out and out road bike but as I can only justify one, it has to be a cross bike. I love mine to bits.
Norm's right again. There are many more cross bikes available now than even two years ago. Just because one doesn't fit the bill doesn't mean others won't. Most will have bottle mounts. Many have mudguard mounts although mine doesn't but I use mtb guards that come off easily when it's dry. You can get clip on road guards anyway if you feel you need those and there's more likely to be room for them in a cross frame than on some road frames.
Good luck wth your choice.
bumping this old thread up as it as answered so many of my questions about should i buy racer or cyclocross with the cyclocross wining, at my level of fitness im sure if i did a 10 mile tt the time difference would be negligable
my problem being i like turning big gears with low cadence so would need a cyclocross bike with minimum 50t front as im not sure i would be happy with a 46
the bike would be used as a training bike doing 50 60 mile training rides with or without mudgaurds with good road tyres (25's) and used to cycle with the family around forest tracks with wider tyres. on this purchase i would be looking to spend £1000 to £1500 so if i could set it up to be a tourer all the better and strip down to challenge my self on local 10mile tt
i have a mountain bike for rough winter off road stuff and a self built fixie for 10 mile high energy stuff
can 1 bike tick my boxes