Since cycling remains pretty much the only thing I find interesting or rewarding (yet I can't get out on the bike much currently) I've been self-indulgently clinging to the idea of a future "neo-retro" steel road bike build; researching the intricacies of marrying an old steel frame to a modern groupset and keeping an eye on the market for suitable candidate.
Long story short after a few beers I ended up arranging to look at something that looked like a good bet. I had a good list of points to check on the day but thanks to various factors really didn't pay nearly enough attention, got stiffed and ended up buying a rotter. Spoiler: amongst other things the frame is cracked
This isn't going into projects as I'm not even sure if I'll do anything with it and it might just get written off / punted on.
So here it is; presented for the entertainment of CC; and hopefully some advice as to how to proceed once the sniggering has died down...
On paper the bike looked good:
- Evidently the work of a small / custom frame builder
- Fitted STIs and 9-speed groupset, so correct rear axle spacing to take a current 11sp setup
- Forks with an internal crown (looks nicer and apparently something usually found on higher-end bikes)
- Reasonable spec components..
In practice the bike looks less good (some of which I spotted on the day, some I only discovered when getting it home - I'm sure it has more to give):
- Cracked seatpost tube
- Seized seatpost
- Generally very tatty frame / general condition
- Won't shift the full range of gears on the back (think this is just an adjustment problem)
- Play in front hub bearings
The frame is apparently a "Mick Gray"; a name I've not heard of before and there's scant info on the net about the guy. The seat tube is 57cm c-c, the top tube 58cm c-c so it's pretty stretched compared to what I'm used to (for reference my Routier has a 58.5-ish cm seat tube and 57.5cm top tube); especially given my short torso..
As it stands, according to my shonky bathroom scales the bike weighs around 10.2kg - which I think is pretty reasonable for an oldish steel frame with a mid-range groupset.
The bike has a full 105 5500 (I think) 2x9 groupset , which is a bit tatty but (rear shifting notwithstanding) all appears to work pretty well. Apparently this groupset was available from 1999 - 2006 IIRC, and given how complete it is would guess that it was original-fitment when this bike was new.
On top of the frame's already "generous" reach, the bike is fitted with a silly 125mm-ish stem. I think I'd need one of around 70mm to bring the reach to the bars closer to what I'm used to..
The headset is also 105. There's a braze-on front pump mount; although no corresponding rear mount; which I guess was probably removed when the bike was re-painted in the past. The lugs don't appear to be anything to elaborate - anyone recognise them?
The fork with its internal crown and recessed brake nut. Tyre clearance is huge. Cable guides are mis-matched..
The front wheel is a "Rolf Vector Pro" with a disconcertingly small amount (14) of aero-profile spokes with internal nipples. These seem to have been quite high-end wheels at one stage; with the rears having a bit of a rep for fragility - probably why the one on this bike doesn't match the front.
Pedals are LOOK Spds, which seem a bit posh (if tatty). The larger sprocket on the crankset is 53-tooth; couldn't be bothered to count the smaller one but I'd guess it's either a 42 or 39.
Compelling evidence that it's been re-sprayed; apparently Mick Gray has / had some association with API - so this would support the idea that the frame's what the stickers say it is..
More detailing of the bottom bracket shell and slightly unusual chainstay bridge...
The incorrectly-routed cables on the underside and pretty atrocious, wear-and-corrosion-courting integral cable guides.. there's no serial no. that I can see; note the single "S" stamped on the shell - given its positioning it'd not surprise me if there was some more letting under the filth..
...
Long story short after a few beers I ended up arranging to look at something that looked like a good bet. I had a good list of points to check on the day but thanks to various factors really didn't pay nearly enough attention, got stiffed and ended up buying a rotter. Spoiler: amongst other things the frame is cracked
This isn't going into projects as I'm not even sure if I'll do anything with it and it might just get written off / punted on.
So here it is; presented for the entertainment of CC; and hopefully some advice as to how to proceed once the sniggering has died down...
On paper the bike looked good:
- Evidently the work of a small / custom frame builder
- Fitted STIs and 9-speed groupset, so correct rear axle spacing to take a current 11sp setup
- Forks with an internal crown (looks nicer and apparently something usually found on higher-end bikes)
- Reasonable spec components..
In practice the bike looks less good (some of which I spotted on the day, some I only discovered when getting it home - I'm sure it has more to give):
- Cracked seatpost tube
- Seized seatpost
- Generally very tatty frame / general condition
- Won't shift the full range of gears on the back (think this is just an adjustment problem)
- Play in front hub bearings
The frame is apparently a "Mick Gray"; a name I've not heard of before and there's scant info on the net about the guy. The seat tube is 57cm c-c, the top tube 58cm c-c so it's pretty stretched compared to what I'm used to (for reference my Routier has a 58.5-ish cm seat tube and 57.5cm top tube); especially given my short torso..
As it stands, according to my shonky bathroom scales the bike weighs around 10.2kg - which I think is pretty reasonable for an oldish steel frame with a mid-range groupset.
The bike has a full 105 5500 (I think) 2x9 groupset , which is a bit tatty but (rear shifting notwithstanding) all appears to work pretty well. Apparently this groupset was available from 1999 - 2006 IIRC, and given how complete it is would guess that it was original-fitment when this bike was new.
On top of the frame's already "generous" reach, the bike is fitted with a silly 125mm-ish stem. I think I'd need one of around 70mm to bring the reach to the bars closer to what I'm used to..
The headset is also 105. There's a braze-on front pump mount; although no corresponding rear mount; which I guess was probably removed when the bike was re-painted in the past. The lugs don't appear to be anything to elaborate - anyone recognise them?
The fork with its internal crown and recessed brake nut. Tyre clearance is huge. Cable guides are mis-matched..
The front wheel is a "Rolf Vector Pro" with a disconcertingly small amount (14) of aero-profile spokes with internal nipples. These seem to have been quite high-end wheels at one stage; with the rears having a bit of a rep for fragility - probably why the one on this bike doesn't match the front.
Pedals are LOOK Spds, which seem a bit posh (if tatty). The larger sprocket on the crankset is 53-tooth; couldn't be bothered to count the smaller one but I'd guess it's either a 42 or 39.
Compelling evidence that it's been re-sprayed; apparently Mick Gray has / had some association with API - so this would support the idea that the frame's what the stickers say it is..
More detailing of the bottom bracket shell and slightly unusual chainstay bridge...
The incorrectly-routed cables on the underside and pretty atrocious, wear-and-corrosion-courting integral cable guides.. there's no serial no. that I can see; note the single "S" stamped on the shell - given its positioning it'd not surprise me if there was some more letting under the filth..
...
Last edited: