Cathryn
Legendary Member
- Location
- Marlborough, Wiltshire
đź‘Ť Anyone can start any thread of their choice
But this one operates perfectly well! No need.
đź‘Ť Anyone can start any thread of their choice
Lots to look forward to though - bring on the climb up to Lagos de Covadonga!
Today’s finish was incredible! Realini’s first WWT win! Than the victory given to van Vlueten! Then back to Realini! Bonkers!
Sdworkx not happy with other teams taking advantage of Vollerings stop for a pee break!
Is 7 stages a Grand Tour?
(Paris-Nice is 8)
🤷‍♀️
most women’s cycling fans feel a little odd calling it a grand tour for that reason
yeah, that's what I think. I guess I'm never comfortable Calling Things Something They're Not, even when there are good reasons.
Three weeks because we want suffering ! It's all about endurance.Personally speaking im not for shortening any races.I feel that at the moment, they are the grand tours within the women’s peloton so I’m fairly comfy calling them that due to the context. It’s only when you compare them to the men’s that it feels uncomfortable. I think this discomfort is inevitable whilst women’s cycling becomes more professional.
I’d also argue that women’s cycling (and even men’s cycling) doesn’t need a three week tour. Two weeks feels grand enough…I’ve always felt that three week tours are a little unnecessary. I don’t think women’s cycling has to mirror itself on the men’s sport….it’s new enough to take what works well for the men but reject what is inappropriate.
100% agree. The men's sport is burdened down by tradition and the opportunity is there to cherry pick the most useful bits. For example maybe over-long flat stages, with a pointless breakaway and sprint finish aren't the best entertainment, maybe a day poncing around drinking champagne and taking it easy isn't ideal sport who knows?I don’t think women’s cycling has to mirror itself on the men’s sport….it’s new enough to take what works well for the men but reject what is inappropriate.
Three weeks because we want suffering ! It's all about endurance. Personally speaking im not for shortening any races.
100% agree. The men's sport is burdened down by tradition and the opportunity is there to cherry pick the most useful bits. For example maybe over-long flat stages, with a pointless breakaway and sprint finish aren't the best entertainment, maybe a day poncing around drinking champagne and taking it easy isn't ideal sport who knows?
If they end up with their major multi stage races not being exactly 21 stages, or not being in Italy, Spain and France, (and not raced by men) ... who cares as long as they put on a good show?
That said, 7 stages isn't ideal, but it is what it is.
As to whether they are called Grand Tours* or not ... well, it'll give us something to talk about when there's nothing else happening and we have got bored with talking about chain lube I suppose.
* Edit: Grands Tours. Sorry, French pedants.