Miles or Km's? which do you use to record a ride?

Do you use Miles or Km's for recording distance travelled?


  • Total voters
    128
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rasmus

Without a clever title
Location
Bristol
Miles for me, can't say I know why other than it's what I've always done.

My brother likes talking in KMs and I just smile and nod. I know the standard distances 5k/3 miles. 10k/6 miles, 20k/12 miles but anything else requires a more complicated than neccessary long winded mental arithmetic process - cue nodding and smiling.
That gets pretty inaccurate, though. 10km is actually 6.2 miles, so for longer distances you end up being quite far off. It's better the other way - 5 miles is almost exactly 8 km.

Easy conversion "mental math" method for any milage: Take the distance in miles and add half of it on top. The take 1/10th of the original mileage and add that to the total. Eg 7 miles is 7+3.5+0.7=11.2 km

When I'm doing km to miles conversions in my head, I tend to guess a mile number that is close, work out what that comes to, and then adjust down/up as necessary.
 

SpaCyclist

Well-Known Member
Both, but mainly Km.
The main reason is Ordnance Survey maps. I plan both walks and rides using the OS grid as a rough guide to distance. When I am out I will use the grid on my gps display to quickly look at how far it is to the next turn. However, when I get back, I do tend to work out roughly how far I went in miles as well. I have left Strava showing Km for distance and m for height which ties in with the way my gps is displaying things.
 
That gets pretty inaccurate, though. 10km is actually 6.2 miles, so for longer distances you end up being quite far off. It's better the other way - 5 miles is almost exactly 8 km.

Easy conversion "mental math" method for any milage: Take the distance in miles and add half of it on top. The take 1/10th of the original mileage and add that to the total. Eg 7 miles is 7+3.5+0.7=11.2 km
You think that is easier than multiplying by 8 and dividing by 5? (7*8=56/5=11.1) And going the other way is just as easy.

I guess we all have different ways of understanding numbers.
 

ayceejay

Guru
Location
Rural Quebec
Lol. My dad way back in his young days was a fencing and drainage contractor and did drains by the chain at that time.
No doubt a lot of the land he was working on was measured that way so it makes sense and I know people who still use those terms (and rod) when fencing.
 
I have found parsecs more useful for longer rides.

I prefer nanometers. The numbers are always bigger and therefore sound more impressive. Not sure how far a parsec is, how many nanometers are there in a parsec?

Seriously tho I only use miles.
 

Asa Post

Super Iconic Legend
Location
Sheffield
I prefer nanometers. The numbers are always bigger and therefore sound more impressive. Not sure how far a parsec is, how many nanometers are there in a parsec?
1 nanometre is 3.24077929 × (10 raised to the power -26) Parsecs (sorry, can't do superscripts in this editor)

Here to help :hello:
 
Top Bottom