Media coverage of Prince Phillips passing.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
There’s a curious thing going on with the BBC’s reporting for the four nations.
Below are the broadcaster’s headlines for the UK, England, Wales, N. Ireland and Scotland respectively.

What’s going on? 🤔

View attachment 584359
View attachment 584360 View attachment 584361 View attachment 584362 View attachment 584363

What's going on is the lead story for the UK is the same story for the four nations, which often happens.

Or put another way, nothing is going on.
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
What's going on is the lead story for the UK is the same story for the four nations

Except it’s not.
 
I mourned the passing of the Queen's husband by shifting a load of old carpets, rubble and timber to the recycling centre in a car club van. I saw many people gathering for similar rememberance in parks, pubs, DIY stores amd supermarkets. Always in our thoughts...
 

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
Except it’s not.

It was for the BBC, although of course everyone is an editor and everyone knows how to the job better than those paid to do it.

Worth bearing in mind Phil was Duke of Edinburgh.

Caught a snippet of the repeat on BBC.

I'm glad they got nice weather for it. A lot of soldiers could have been stood outside in the rain.
Nice song choices 👍

I watched the procession.

They were knee deep in Rolls Royces and Bentleys, and all our servicemen in their dress uniforms made an impressive sight.

Harry and William walked apart, separated, I think, by one of the Kraut noblemen.

Presumably it was thought he could pull on sufficiently if the pair of them started scrapping.
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
584513
 

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"
1618751987153.png


No words needed
 

Drago

Legendary Member
The problem wasn't "the level of coverage", as the BBC state. If it had been actual coverage it wouldn't have been so bad.

The problem was a prominent person passed away, and othet than the fact of his passing there was actuslly nothing happening, so we got days of talking heads spouting utter bollards.

Imagine a wildlife documentary, 20 seconds of a lion eating a polar bear, then 59 minutes of David Attenbourough making stuff up to filling the in empty rest of the programme.

Or Eastenders, Phill slaps Ian Beale, and then were get 29 minutes of Phil taking about the cardigans Beale has worn over the decades. The Beeb wouldn't do it with any other type of programming, so why do they insist of doing it with the news?

The newsflashes, fine.

The normal reporting during news programmes, fine.

Minor cancellations for a 1 or 2 hour special, but one in which they tell us something substantive instead of just treading water waiting for something to happen, fine.

Mass cancellations of programming across multiple stations and platforms to give us a single line headline, "The Duke of Edinburgh has died", and then hours and hours of people ad libbng utyer rubbish, not fine.

Yet again the Beeb just don't see it, and yet again thats another small nail in the coffin of the licence fee.
 
The problem wasn't "the level of coverage", as the BBC state. If it had been actual coverage it wouldn't have been so bad.

The problem was a prominent person passed away, and othet than the fact of his passing there was actuslly nothing happening, so we got days of talking heads spouting utter bollards.

Imagine a wildlife documentary, 20 seconds of a lion eating a polar bear, then 59 minutes of David Attenbourough making stuff up to filling the in empty rest of the programme.

Or Eastenders, Phill slaps Ian Beale, and then were get 29 minutes of Phil taking about the cardigans Beale has worn over the decades. The Beeb wouldn't do it with any other type of programming, so why do they insist of doing it with the news?

The newsflashes, fine.

The normal reporting during news programmes, fine.

Minor cancellations for a 1 or 2 hour special, but one in which they tell us something substantive instead of just treading water waiting for something to happen, fine.

Mass cancellations of programming across multiple stations and platforms to give us a single line headline, "The Duke of Edinburgh has died", and then hours and hours of people ad libbng utyer rubbish, not fine.

Yet again the Beeb just don't see it, and yet again thats another small nail in the coffin of the licence fee.
Yebbut if we get rid of the BBC we'll lose such high quality journalism as "number 10 sources say..." as well as the revelation that Hugh Grant visited a bakery in Frome earlier!!111 And that other high profile people to visit Somerset are ...

It's honestly embarrassing, they're being driven into the ground and are apparently powerless to stop it
 

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
and then hours and hours of people ad libbng utyer rubbish, not fine.

A lot of the sofa guests I saw had some interesting anecdotes to tell of the time they met Phil.

Also worth bearing in mind that while 110,000+ people complained, many millions didn't.
 
Top Bottom