Max heart rate and zones.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
Jody

Jody

Stubborn git
No I didn't stop pedaling until near the bottom but its only a 15 second section. I try and not freewheel if I can help it but just keep the legs turning when going downhill.

As an experiment I am going to wear both straps and compare but also see how long it takes to get back to normal after a ride. What level should it drop to and how quick would an unfit persons rate drop?
 
OP
OP
Jody

Jody

Stubborn git
If you don't know what your max is because you've never done a ramp test, take the 200 you've seen, in which case the average and Max above look possible and probable. Presumably you were working quite hard at the 185 point..

Yes 185 is trying as much as I can with a view to not stopping and keeping the momentum going.

The ramp test looks very painful. Would probably only manage a couple of minutes before I fall off the bike in a heap. I couldn't do 1 minute a 280w never mind 3.
 

moo

Veteran
Location
North London
That explains the constantly high hr then.

I've done a couple of 25 mile time trials with an average heart rate of 90% maximum - that's over an hour of constant pedalling where it fluctuated from 85-95%. Done me no harm. I'm 36 too btw.
 

moo

Veteran
Location
North London
As an experiment I am going to wear both straps and compare but also see how long it takes to get back to normal after a ride. What level should it drop to and how quick would an unfit persons rate drop?

As a relatively fit person mine drops by over 40 beats per minute. It's been a while since I tested.
 
OP
OP
Jody

Jody

Stubborn git
Thanks Crackle. I will have a look next time I get back.

Moo, my only concern is I really haven't looked after my body in the last 10+ years. If I carried on riding like I did in my teens I wouldn't even question it.
 

Citius

Guest
Take the strap off and relax...

Agreed. Unless you have any particular reason to be using a HR monitor while cycling, just bin it and ride. HR is a notoriously poor way of measuring effort, and unless you have established firm parameters (such as a true MHR), the data it gives you is pretty much useless anyway.
 

Sittingduck

Legendary Member
Location
Somewhere flat
I think you need to chill out a bit with the efforts, at least until you gain decent fitness. Maybe look into HR at a later stage.

Forget about the age thing. I regularly ride with guys who are older than me who have max HR like a palputating hamster - it's just how they are wired.
 

ChrisEyles

Guru
Location
Devon
I used a HRM a lot when I was running, also a polar watch, and I'm 31 so close enough for comparison. Over a 50 minute 10k (I'm not a fast runner!), I'd average somewhere around 160bpm, with a max around 185bpm. I guess my HR could go higher, but I don't usually push the pain barrier!

I recently stuck it on during a 50 mile ride, out of curiosity. My average was more like 125bpm, with a max around 150bpm (guess it would go a fair bit higher if I'd thrown in an evil hill or two, though). I didn't push it, just rode at regular pace, which for me is 15-16mph average (I'm not a particularly fast cyclist either!).

Anyway, your numbers are more or less in line with my running values, so I'd say it's a perfectly safe HR to exercise at.

If I was going to be sustaining the effort for more than 2 hours (which is pretty much always the case on a weekend ride for me), I'd look to bring your HR down a little and work on building your endurance at lower effort. Spinning a slightly lower gear at a slightly higher cadence (aim for ~90rpm) is good for this.

It's easy to get pre-occupied with these (and all sorts of other) numbers when "training".... the best advice I can give is to get out on the bike as much as you can, maybe push yourself to slightly longer distances, and above all to enjoy your cycling! The speed and fitness will come as a natural by-product (until you plateau like I have - but then again I'm perfectly happy with where I am right now).
 

ChrisEyles

Guru
Location
Devon
@Citius and @T.M.H.N.E.T - I would have thought there would be at least some basis for comparison?

But profess to not have much specialist (much less medical) knowledge, so am happy to be corrected if not! Is HR really just too variable from person to person to be a reliable indicator for anything?
 
Top Bottom