srw
It's a bit more complicated than that...
Doing the sums (as I'm typing), using as a reference: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_energy
50g of carbs, at 4 calories per gram, equates to about 200 carbohydrate calories. I'm assuming here that with all the faff of sticking to a very strict diet you're both aware of the exact composition of food, rather than using "50g of carbs" as a shorthand for "50g of food containing carbs".
At a rough guess, given the weight loss both of you have declared, and knowing how difficult it is to eat large quantities of protein or fat without carbs to provide a contrast, you're on restricted-calorie diets of, say, 1600 calories per day.
That means that 200/1600 = 12.5% of your calorie intake is from carbs - more if you go higher. That's low and abnormal. Frustratingly, the wiki-page on Ketosis (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketosis) gives a different ratio than the one I found above for carbs - but, conveniently for me, one not different from 12.5% (and much higher than the one FD suggests) - and gives four different references for the fact that it's not low enough to induce ketosis.
Looking at the wiki-page on the ketogenic diet used to treat epilepsy (the things you learn from Cyclechat - http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet) gives a figure of between 86% and 90% of calories from fat.
My best guess - and bear in mind that I'm an ordinary sceptic, not a medic - is that you're eating a reasonably balanced restricted calorie diet, rather than anything inducing a specific and different digestion pathway. Which, frankly, doesn't surprise me all that much - most diets, when you come to investigate them, come down to the same thing. And, no surprise, eating a restricted calorie diet is (a) very difficult to keep up over the very long term, (b) effective in the medium term, and (c) very effective in the short term, then makes you feel lousy for several weeks.
50g of carbs, at 4 calories per gram, equates to about 200 carbohydrate calories. I'm assuming here that with all the faff of sticking to a very strict diet you're both aware of the exact composition of food, rather than using "50g of carbs" as a shorthand for "50g of food containing carbs".
At a rough guess, given the weight loss both of you have declared, and knowing how difficult it is to eat large quantities of protein or fat without carbs to provide a contrast, you're on restricted-calorie diets of, say, 1600 calories per day.
That means that 200/1600 = 12.5% of your calorie intake is from carbs - more if you go higher. That's low and abnormal. Frustratingly, the wiki-page on Ketosis (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketosis) gives a different ratio than the one I found above for carbs - but, conveniently for me, one not different from 12.5% (and much higher than the one FD suggests) - and gives four different references for the fact that it's not low enough to induce ketosis.
Looking at the wiki-page on the ketogenic diet used to treat epilepsy (the things you learn from Cyclechat - http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet) gives a figure of between 86% and 90% of calories from fat.
My best guess - and bear in mind that I'm an ordinary sceptic, not a medic - is that you're eating a reasonably balanced restricted calorie diet, rather than anything inducing a specific and different digestion pathway. Which, frankly, doesn't surprise me all that much - most diets, when you come to investigate them, come down to the same thing. And, no surprise, eating a restricted calorie diet is (a) very difficult to keep up over the very long term, (b) effective in the medium term, and (c) very effective in the short term, then makes you feel lousy for several weeks.