Ming the Merciless
There is no mercy
- Location
- Inside my skull
There is no body of evidence that supports hiviz when it coming to cycling on roads.
If there are no winners in cases like this, explain that to the family that lost one of theirs.
Driving licence should be removed for life. No hardship plea should be allowed/accepted.
Justice is what we get when the verdict is in our favour.So justice is only about punishment, not redemption? And punishment should extend unilaterally to the accused and his family regardless.
I'm not sure I'd want a justice system that works like that.
The underlined bit is very debatable (look at how much information there is in the helmets thread), but this isn't the helmets thread, so I won't debate it here.
Him and thousands like him.Christ, he can barely grunt out a sentence in English, yet he was allowed in charge of a multi ton kinetic weapon.
You'd think so.Surly the fact that he never saw no push bike would mean he's guilty?
I'm sorry but this is a complete Red Herring, I would humbly suggest you remove the post or at least the link to the misleading video. In this instance the lorry driver was was approaching the junction, he was turning left, the victim (because that was what he was) was coming from the right, there is no way he should have been missed. Had the driver been paying proper attention he would have seen the cyclist at some point, either as he approached the junction or at the junction he didn't stop at.As for the "blind spot" argument there is a great video that illustrates just how much a lorry driver can / can't see.:
That's not what I read the van was behind the lorry he saw the cyclist the lorry driver didn'tI am of the opinion that the lorry driver approached the junction and was looking for ‘motorised traffic’. He saw the van (behind the cyclist), and attempted the squeeze into the space in front of the van.
Drivers attempting to put themselves in a perceived space that really isn’t there is a pattern of driving I see with some degree of regularity, but without the tragic consequences of this incident
I am of the opinion that the lorry driver approached the junction and was looking for ‘motorised traffic’. He saw the van (behind the cyclist), and attempted the squeeze into the space in front of the van.
Drivers attempting to put themselves in a perceived space that really isn’t there is a pattern of driving I see with some degree of regularity, but without the tragic consequences of this incident