buyruk
Active Member
He's won the Giro
That's why I said, in front of Froome and Contador. That's the key.
He's won the Giro
Sky looks like they've made a bollix by letting Konig leave,
When?
Why?
He's won the Giro
I'm wondering now if I didn't imagine it! Or it was an unsubstantiated rumour.Didn't know that. Shame. He's hardly had a chance, though I was surprised he wasn't in the Tour team - guess his numbers don't add up.
So what can Froome afford to give away before Stage 19's 37k TT. I think if it slips outside 1.30 to Quintana he's had it
CF - paced himself out of trouble, same as he always does :-)
Although, tbh, I don't think winning this Vuelta would prove much about Quintana that we didn't know already. Froome is clearly feeling the effects of a long season, while Contador is looking like a rider whose best days are behind him.
I'm wondering now if I didn't imagine it! Or it was an unsubstantiated rumour.
In my defence, he was in the bookies odds!You did manage to convince me at the start of this thread that Purito was entered, much against my better judgement as I knew full well he'd said the Olympics was his last race. I think you just chuck these things in to see if we're paying attention.
That was what I thought (on the basis of no evidence whatsoever) was going on - that Froome was watching the numbers on his stem and not the race, Sky having calculated beforehand what he needed to do to get his best time, leaving others to see if they could better it.Don't know if I'm entirely convinced by this - is there evidence that Froome was in trouble? He was distanced by Movistar, but it seemed from what I saw that he was doing the usual Sky ride by the numbers, rather than that he was in trouble on the early slopes. Admittedly I'm only going by the highlights, which can be misleading.
One thing I've never seen anyone point out, and I think is interesting, is that Froome's tactic of 'you need to do X numbers to achieve Y' is pretty much exactly the same technique the Team GB pursuiters use on the track.
Don't know if I'm entirely convinced by this - is there evidence that Froome was in trouble? He was distanced by Movistar, but it seemed from what I saw that he was doing the usual Sky ride by the numbers, rather than that he was in trouble on the early slopes. Admittedly I'm only going by the highlights, which can be misleading.
One thing I've never seen anyone point out, and I think is interesting, is that Froome's tactic of 'you need to do X numbers to achieve Y' is pretty much exactly the same technique the Team sky
The profile is on page 13 of the thread. Different gradients and even a couple of small descents.Is the covadonga a very consistent gradient?
But reasonably consistently steepThe profile is on page 13 of the thread. Different gradients and even a couple of small descents.
All answered before I got back to the thread. You're only missing a 'Who' from the line up and maybe a 'where'.Why?
I'm sure I read he had a plan but so far he's been a bit Schleck like, we know he's in the race.........Ché?