Levo-Lon
Guru
It is shoot
Shirley it's shot
It is shoot
Shirley it's shot
Wouldn't the honest response be Yes, or No?My response would be " You can order, or have a Latte, and then I shall get you the Latte",
This way of ordering has now become very common.
Doesn't surprise me.Not that I give shīt, but your post is a couple of commas short of an A grade
There are two concepts in the subject of this clause - precision and concise use of standard English. So "are" is correct, as well as being stylistically more elegant. Sometimes it's better if the verb is attracted into the singular by the last of list; not this time.' precision and concise use of standard English is important'.
Starting a sentence with a number is poor style, so 'Thirty years ago'.
Like most of facebook it was probably not written by the young people who this thread seems to be designed to complain about. I can't say I've noticed much correlation between age and inarticulacy in writing - you get it as often from the middle-aged and old as from the young. However, I am concerned by those poor sods going through school at the moment. They're being taught English in a way which has previously only ever existed in the fantasies of previous Secretaries of State for Education.This appeared on the local FB group... I've read it several times and i'm still baffled
View attachment 457849
Nicely put!if the verb is attracted into the singular by the last of list
An extra indefinite article would have been better.Nicely put!
An extra indefinite article would have been better.