byegad
Legendary Member
- Location
- NE England
I drink therefore I am.
I hope your cook isn't religious. When it comes to food, Papal Bull is better than a Diet of Worms.
Flat rice noodles..
Which are a bit wormlike - on reflection
And mixed stir fried veg, with lots of seeds, and mushrooms
Not a religious cook, but definitely an philosophical one.
We're on time machines, and visiting Ancient Egypt right now ..
I'll let you know if we get anywhere.
Only for the great Celtic thinker - Philip O'Sophy...
I'll get my coat... Or will I
One of my favourite philosophers is Hannah Arendt. Her book on The Origins of Totalitarianism helps to explain much of what is going on in the post truth populist world of today. This little quote from that book seems pretty relevant today:
“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
I agree - of course she's mainly referring to what she calls the mob, a group who seem disconnected from society, not belonging, and perpetually angry. This mob can be manipulated and complicit when bad things are happening.Basically that occupying a place of lazy cynicism is somehow the cool, and or 'clever' place to be.
But in truth it's just plain lazy...
There are often questions about philosophers on University Challenge, many from ancient times, many from 18th and 19th centuries, a few from the 20th century. But they seem to stop around the 1960’s. Outside of quiz shows and history programmes I have never heard them mentioned. From time to time we hear reports in the news of advances in all sorts of highly academic subjects, physics, maths, sometimes history, but never anything, I stand to be corrected, about philosophy. Do philosophers still exist now ? And in what way does their work contribute to modern life ?
Flat rice noodles..
Which are a bit wormlike - on reflection
And mixed stir fried veg, with lots of seeds, and mushrooms
Not a religious cook, but definitely an philosophical one.
We're on time machines, and visiting Ancient Egypt right now ..
I'll let you know if we get anywhere.
Define professor.Prof.Peterson might qualify? He seems to be an advocate of personal responsibility, and champions free speech over restricted.
That is an amazing book. Every page seems to be thought-provoking. Definitely a one page per day book, for me!One of my favourite philosophers is Hannah Arendt. Her book on The Origins of Totalitarianism helps to explain much of what is going on in the post truth populist world of today. This little quote from that book seems pretty relevant today:
“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
May I be so bold as to enquire: what kind of mushrooms?