To undertake this activity there would have had to have been a trained leader, a detailed and thorough risk assessment, approval by the District scout authority and suchlike. My lot are going walking up a small stream next Monday which I am quite happy will be safe/controlled risk. The location of the activity
@captain nemo1701 describes is surprising to me.
It's very central Bristol and is frequented by drug users, hence my concern over discarded 'sharps' which our engineering crew reported when we were down there doing some groundwork for the new widened road/culvert. It's fenced off, which should be a hint that it's not the best spot to launch craft from. And there's always my favourite along canals:
Leptospirosis (Weils disease).
Here's a Wikipedia extract on it:
At-risk occupations[edit]
Occupations at risk include
veterinarians, slaughterhouse workers, farmers, sailors on rivers, sewer maintenance workers, waste disposal facility workers, and people who work on derelict buildings.
[24] Slaughterhouse workers can contract the disease through contact with infected blood or body fluids.
Rowers, kayakers and canoeists also sometimes contract the disease.
[25] It was once mostly work-related but is now often also related to
adventure tourism and recreational activities.
[5]
(my italics)
The local rag here - Bristol Post - is always banging on about cycling on pavements. So when I use a new segregated facility, the last thing I expect to see are vehicles blocking it. OK, so I could have used the road and I did. But then again, why were they there in the first place?. It's clear that they were avoiding a parking ticket by not parking up on the double yellow lines, but then block the pavement/cycle path. Some people seem to operate on the basis of complying with one regulation by breaking another.
Plus, they had to lift the raft over that fence, down a slope into what is, basically, filthy water (it's Feeder Canal). Not the best environment to introduce kids to water!. I felt that it was also inappropriate timing, as the police divers had been out a few weeks earlier searching that very spot for someone who went missing from the Motion Nightclub across the water (he unfortunately drowned). Further upstream there are steps down onto the canal bank for fishing and you see canoeists all the time around the canal - perhaps it would have been more appropriate and safer to enter the water from further upstream from a designated access point. The whole thing looked very amateurish and I think they just racked up and got on with it - no RA plan or anything. If you look at the area on Bing Maps streetview, you get the old layout that does have a wide grassy bank. But that's long gone now with the widened road and cycle path.
I've no problem with kids doing adventure sports etc,and yes, risk is part of the game, but needs to be reduced and controlled. Fortunately, it appears nothing went wrong.