Not at all. The quarry birds are laid down. I made that clear. We source them as ethically as we can. We buy 2200 partridge poults each year, in August, by which time we will have made sure they have cover, secure pens with no damage to minimise injury, and we buy locally so that they spend as little time as absolutely possible in transit. We aim for 30 minutes from first being crated to the release pen.
The birds are inspected daily to ensure they are healthy, fed and watered. A team of us take it in turns to look after them until they are released in September.
We shoot 35 percent of what we put down in an average year. That works out at approximately two to three birds per gun per shoot day, so none are surplus. We absolutely insist all guns take and eat a brace apiece.
Round woods wouldn't exist on many farms were it not for the traditional pheasant shoot. Beetle banks were designed and built to provide a food source for partridge. Hedgerows are far more expensive to maintain than fencing. Set aside cover strips would otherwise be a financial loss to farmers on whose land any shoot exists.
I don't expect any of these inconvenient facts to appear in any of the reading you do. Perhaps I could implore you to read a bit wider, with a view to understanding how the infrastructure works. Not just the big commercial estates, but the local rural stuff. That's what I am involved with, and I am trying to show you that there are huge differences between the way shooting carries on in 2016.
By the way, BASC have introduced new best practice guidelines insisting that shot birds make it into the food chain, and not the stink pit which is a valid criticism of some enterprises.
I hope you can start to be reassured that the ethics of many shooters don't mirror those of the caricatures presented by interest and pressure groups. Misinformation and a lack of willingness to think a bit deeper creates the sort of polarised argument I'm trying to avoid.