Andy in Germany
Guru
- Location
- Rottenburg am Neckar
How long is it you've been in Germany, that's what English roads are like now
Ah. Good point.
Eighteen years, as you asked...
How long is it you've been in Germany, that's what English roads are like now
I’ve been killed to death five times this week and it’s only Tuesday :-)
We just need Sustrans to design the national car network. Then they would all be busy pushing their cars through muddy fields, trying to lift them over barriers, and trying to spot the signs the size of a postage stamp, whilst we take the direct cycle ways, A roads, B roads...
Imagine a world where your freedom to move around is restricted.
Imagine a world where you can't read the local classifieds, hook a trailer and go fetch your new spare bed.
Imagine a world where you can't put a bike in your car and find a nice scenic place to start a ride.
Imagine a world where you are at the beg and call of time tables.
Imagine a world where choice is taken away from you.
Imagine a world where more fuel is consumed by piecemeal deliveries than by bulk personal shopping.
Imagine a world where insanity prevails.
It rather depends on how much you drive your motor, doesn't it? Anyway, there are perfectly sound reasons for using them. If you would like to carry five sheets of 18mm MDF back from Builder Depot to my house over a weekend, send me a contact number. Ownership of a car/van , per se , shouldn't be judged as some kind of knee-jerk eco-crime.And yet this is the world of tens of millions of people in this country who can't or choose not to have a car, let alone the majority of the 7.5 billion people on this planet. It is not essential for existence. Nor is a car a requirement for a happy fulfilling life.
As for insanity... the reality is that traffic jam in the morning as everyone rushes to get to work (it's ironic that car ownership is sold on the idea of personal freedom, when in fact it is mostly used for the drudgery of getting to and from work). Or that our roads are so clogged with parked cars it is now an active impediment to driving those very same cars. Or the tens of thousands who die every year in this country alone due to the pollution of those cars. Or that a vital irreplaceable resource, one that runs most of the world's irrigation pumps, is a feedstock for fertiliser and pesticide manufacture and is critical for mechanised argiculture - is in fact responsible for most of the food on your plate - is being squandered in such a way.
Our descendants will not thank us.
And yet this is the world of tens of millions of people in this country who can't or choose not to have a car, let alone the majority of the 7.5 billion people on this planet. It is not essential for existence. Nor is a car a requirement for a happy fulfilling life.
As for insanity... the reality is that traffic jam in the morning as everyone rushes to get to work (it's ironic that car ownership is sold on the idea of personal freedom, when in fact it is mostly used for the drudgery of getting to and from work). Or that our roads are so clogged with parked cars it is now an active impediment to driving those very same cars. Or the tens of thousands who die every year in this country alone due to the pollution of those cars. Or that a vital irreplaceable resource, one that runs most of the world's irrigation pumps, is a feedstock for fertiliser and pesticide manufacture and is critical for mechanised argiculture - is in fact responsible for most of the food on your plate - is being squandered in such a way.
Our descendants will not thank us.
The necessary market forces are there. The move is towards electric. If you don't believe me, just ask Honda, Nissan and JLR workers what's happening. Going electric by itself isn't a solution, of course, I know that. It merely moves the pollution elsewhere. We now have to solve the problem of generating clean reliable electricity in absolute abundance. The technology for that is there - nuclear - but there's no ideological appetite for that at present. The powers that be are still stuck on renewables, which isn't the solution it presents itself as.The pollution problem won't be solved so long as market forces are allowed to remain. the prime driver of consumption. Too little, too late is a very polite term to describe current efforts - without absolutely massive change the world over, the planet is borked, and fiddly round the fringes simply won't do the job.
That's the classic response to nuclear.Nuclear power is not the answer, I had this argument nearly 40yrs ago with my Father (He was part of the team that wrote the control programs for Hartlepool and Heysham power stations)
What do you do with Nuclear Waste after the reactor is scrapped and what happens when one goes 'pop'.
If we had put the same resources into wind/wave/tidal and solar generation then we would already be there, unfortunately the waste product from that doesn't go bang unlike 'spent' fuel rods. The main reason for nuclear energy was in the production of bombs.That's the classic response to nuclear.
Nuclear waste is easily contained in a very, very small space. Look it up, you'll be surprised. It isn't what's portrayed.
The deaths from nuclear incidents is minute compared to death from other power generating schemes. They're just more emotional. A good analogy is a plane crash vs a steady stream of road deaths which don't reach our consciousness.
Nuclear is clean, reliable and cheaper than any renewable.
With enough nuclear plants churning out cheap, reliable energy, we can power the world's cars in two ways - fuel cells and electricity.
Naaah. Name one incident where the waste rods went bang. There is no danger in well-managed waste storage.If we had put the same resources into wind/wave/tidal and solar generation then we would already be there, unfortunately the waste product from that doesn't go bang unlike 'spent' fuel rods. The main reason for nuclear energy was in the production of bombs.