Finally some science. Thanks Fab. Yes, here is how we can make 700 seriously injured, maimed, or dead Londoners, . . sorry, I mean "KSIs" . . vanish in a
blob of visual math!)
My favorite argument? Here it is:
"What would your sweet mother say?"
I must stay clear of the individual-rights rhetoric (only some of which was truly moving). "
Mandatory" was not in my thread-starter, and my sympathies are truly with the individual, languishing in the shadow of
Max Weber's bureaucratic rationalization.
Nevertheless, my thread was initially conceived only in the interests of new commuter warriors, out there running their bicycles inches from fast-moving traffic . . here, outcomes cannot always be predicted. If you tumble hard, you can't stop a head-slammer. Simple and true. I'm sure riders with a lot more experience cycling than me have contributed above, but I nevertheless estimate I've accumulated some 37000 miles of urban cycle commuting in my last 5 years.
Surprisingly, nobody mentioned the Dutch cycling infrastructure. Too bad, cause it's facilitating and inspirational, as many of us know. How did the Dutch bring about their comparative safe cycling infrastructure? Now this is truly worthy of respect!
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2012/01/09/how-the-dutch-got-their-bike-paths/