Shut Up Legs
Down Under Member
By that logic, all pedestrians and motorists should be wearing helmets, as they can't control all possible outcomes eitherYou can't control all the outcomes!

By that logic, all pedestrians and motorists should be wearing helmets, as they can't control all possible outcomes eitherYou can't control all the outcomes!
You have to admit it, prima facie you'd likely believe helmets were useful.
Another one of my observations of these threads is the response to the above statement is going to be met with a request for a peer reviewed journal backing it up and an ensuing mutual back slapping by way of liberal "likes"…
Which would miss the point of the statement but nevertheless be an irresistible cue to a binge of rehearsed reheated arguments smelling of putrid vomit.
I don't believe in compelling people to wear helmets - in practice I tend to wear them if I clip in and don't if I don't clip in. But it seems to me something as a matter of faith on both sides as to the wisdom of either position. Which is all right, it just means that the sneering self-righteousness that does get exhibited is rather tedious and repulsive.
Ok, I'm off !
Every Lid'll Help?2883363 said:Are you sure its not a Lidl?
So I am. I blame Unkers.2883372 said:You are mixing your Tescomores
Gosh, I'm sorry . . I forgot that not everyone looks good in a helmet . .
![]()
On my goodness . . what's that she says . . reduces head injuries by 88%. Nah . . can't be . .
How do you know your head would have been seriously hurt without the helmet? I've run into a truck at 25mph and walked away with stitches.
Pointless thread,
You wear a helmet running?How do you know your head would have been seriously hurt without the helmet? I've run into a truck at 25mph and walked away with stitches.
Pointless thread,
By that logic, all pedestrians and motorists should be wearing helmets, as they can't control all possible outcomes either. Living in a country in which bicycle helmets are mandatory for cycling, I can tell you that the disadvantages far outweigh the (supposed) advantages, and Australia is the laughing stock of the world because of it.
2883398 said:Because, for reasons best known to themselves, some people on the wear a helmet side of the debate seem to want to tell others what they should do.
My favorite argument? Here it is: "What would your sweet mother say?"
Nevertheless, my thread was initially conceived only in the interests of new commuter warriors, out there running their bicycles inches from fast-moving traffic . . here, outcomes cannot always be predicted. If you tumble hard, you can't stop a head-slammer.
Surprisingly, nobody mentioned the Dutch cycling infrastructure. Too bad, cause it's facilitating and inspirational, as many of us know. How did the Dutch bring about their comparative safe cycling infrastructure? Now this is truly worthy of respect!
My response: none of your business. Except that there's a word beginning with "f" between "your" and "business' that the forum software won't let me writeMy favorite argument? Here it is: "What would your sweet mother say?"