Crankarm
Guru
- Location
- Nr Cambridge
Speicher said:Yes but if Banjo's scales can weigh as much as twenty stone they would be even heavier.
![]()
Well, get off them then
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/styles/default/xenforo/smls/laugh.gif)
Speicher said:Yes but if Banjo's scales can weigh as much as twenty stone they would be even heavier.
![]()
Riverman said:Just bought the coolest set of scales for a bargain price. £7.49 and didn't even have to travel far to get them.
http://www.lloydspharmacy.com/webap...top_category=&fromPage=Search&hotspot_prefix=
According to that I'm 180lbs(12.8571 stone) and 16% body fat. So the scales were definitely broken.
I take it these body fat things are not very accurate. Seems a little low that.
Speicher said:To save the awkward ride back with the wieghts, could you just post them back? Remember to wrap them carefully in bubblewrap and cardboard so that they do not get damaged in transit.
Riverman said:81.8kg or probably more like 82kg. Was almost 100kg a year ago, so that's good as I started cycling in April/May.
Ah done the fat thing on the normal setting and it's coming up as roughly 23%.
jimboalee said:The Bioimpedence method of measuring Bodyfat % is VERY wooly.
Don't believe the sales blurb. To get a realistic reading at every measurement occasion, your body NEEDS to be in the same state of hydration.
Go on a tough ride and sweat a lot - Fat % goes up by as much as 4%.
Have a couple of days rest with plenty of fluids and Fat% lowers by 3 - 4%.
They operate by passing a small electric current up one leg and down the other. The ammount of water in your abdomen effects the reading beyond acceptable variation to be of any use for a person who does physical exercise.
Sorry.
I use skinfold calipers.
Riverman said:According to that I'm 180lbs(12.8571 stone) and 16% body fat.
BrumJim said:Spurious accuracy. You are 12.9 stone. Any further decimal places claims a level of accuracy that the scales cannot manage.
(Sorry - spurious accuracy is one of my pet hates when checking reports)