slowmotion
Quite dreadful
- Location
- lost somewhere
Does continual exposure to "Helmet Debates" give you brain damage? You sufferers probably wouldn't notice, but I do detect a need for some more expensive research.
Good question. How much would you trust the results of such research considering the researches would have significant exposure to "Helmet Debates" themeselves?Does continual exposure to "Helmet Debates" give you brain damage? You sufferers probably wouldn't notice, but I do detect a need for some more expensive research.
Excellent point Tommi. I rather wish you had not raised that sensitive matter before my application to The Helmet Research Council comes up for consideration. Shush....Good question. How much would you trust the results of such research considering the researches would have significant exposure to "Helmet Debates" themeselves?
The people that spout off about tin foil hatsYou and me both hb. The people that spout off about helmets, a) doing more harm good, b) where's the proof, c) etc, etc, etc (yawn), have clearly never experienced a helmet shattering, (life threatening), accident that left their helmet in bits but their head in one piece.
I have and I therefore wear a helmet. I know it works as it's been proved too me and my family beyond any doubt, and my family greatly appreciate the fact I wear one.
I can only relay my own experience and let people make up their own minds.
You can argue the benefits or pitfalls of absolutely anything if you really want to, and sadly I feel helmets will always have steadfast believers and blatant non-believers.
Make up your own minds, and above all ride safe
The people that spout off about tin foil hats
a) not doing any good
b) where's the proof
c) etc, etc, etc (yawn)
Have clearly never experienced an alien abduction, (life threatening), incident that left their tin foil hat in bits but their head in one piece.
I have and I therefore wear a tin foil hat. I know it works as it's been proved too me and my family beyond any doubt, and my family greatly appreciate the fact I wear one.
I can only relay my own experience and let people make up their own minds.
You can argue the benefits or pitfalls of absolutely anything if you really want to, and sadly I feel tin foil hats will always have steadfast believers and blatant non-believers.
Make up your own minds, and above all avoid alien abduction
You and me both hb. The people that spout off about helmets, a) doing more harm good, b) where's the proof, c) etc, etc, etc (yawn), have clearly never experienced a helmet shattering, (life threatening), accident that left their helmet in bits but their head in one piece.
I have and I therefore wear a helmet. I know it works as it's been proved too me and my family beyond any doubt, and my family greatly appreciate the fact I wear one.
I can only relay my own experience and let people make up their own minds.
You can argue the benefits or pitfalls of absolutely anything if you really want to, and sadly I feel helmets will always have steadfast believers and blatant non-believers.
Make up your own minds, and above all ride safe
I will only say that's a blatant misrepresentation of the anti-compulsion side. I have fractured my skull, I do wear a helmet but I will challenge anyone who thinks that it's absolutely clear cut you should wear a helmet. It's far from so, nor do I see what expertise health professionals have which qualifies them to comment of the efficacy of cycle helmets, head injuries yes, helmets no.
Proof beyond doubt you say, a large pinch of salt I say. If we'd ever reached that point then these debates would be over.
Peds are often mentioned but it's a large pink herring because everyone forgets about centre of gravity which is far higher on a bike and makes risk comparison moot, as does potential speed.
I think most of the weary posts in these threads stem from those who've seen all this before and still await anything definitive on the subject.
If you asked me for my view, I'd say wear a helmet because on balance I feel it might do you some good and probably won't do you any harm but it could. I'd take a twisted neck over a fractured skull any day though, having done both, though only mildly twisted my neck muscles and not cycling. And if it was going to put someone off cycling, I'd say leave it, as the greater good of cycling outweighs the small risk of a serious head injury.
I think I've fulfilled my helmet quota for this year now, I'd rather talk about pelmets. Surely no-one has pelmets anymore? If they do does it make them more or less likely to ride a bike?
If you asked me for my view, I'd say wear a helmet because on balance I feel it might do you some good and probably won't do you any harm but it could. I'd take a twisted neck over a fractured skull any day though, having done both, though only mildly twisted my neck muscles and not cycling. And if it was going to put someone off cycling, I'd say leave it, as the greater good of cycling outweighs the small risk of a serious head injury.
I think I've fulfilled my helmet quota for this year now, I'd rather talk about pelmets. Surely no-one has pelmets anymore? If they do does it make them more or less likely to ride a bike?
I'm still pondering the great Norris vs Diesel conundrum.
Sam
There isn't one. Diesel is a mere slip of a boy in comparison.
It was, after all, Norris who invented Giraffes by uppercutting a horse.
I'm still pondering the great Norris vs Diesel conundrum.
Is VD tough enough to sport a mullet? No, I rest my case.
Which immediately leads me to the question:
Chuck Norris or Kenny Loggins?
Sam