w00hoo_kent
One of the 64K
- Location
- Maidstone or Greenwich
Cheers, for that. I did have a bryton 50 or something but I dont really get the time to analyse my data post ride so never collected it.
I am intrigued that you got the touring version that does HRM, as I cant understand why someone touring would want to measure HR, cadence yes but not HRM. I guess its just data to analyse.
The Touring + had better features than the Touring (I can't remember which, but looked in to both and made that decision at the time) and we were primarily buying it to help with leisure rides because we'd meander out and about and then get lost and spend ages looking at maps etc. and knowing how handy satnav was in the car it just seemed the way to go. Because we had it I added it in to my commute habit because I'm a bloke and so like crunching data. That it could do HRM was a nice bonus when I decided to give HRM a go but if it couldn't I'd probably have just bought something that could (or used it as a ludicrous excuse to get a 1000).
If it could do cadence, then I'd probably log that to, as I say, I like looking at the squiggly lines on the graphs. I find cadence's main use is as a quick kick that you are backing off. dropping 5-10 rpm is easy for me to do without really realising I've done it and if I'm trying not to ease off then the cadence meter means I'll pick that back up again. It was also interesting (to me anyway) how it related to which gears I was in, so there's a step between (probably) 3rd and 4th which equates to around 10rpm on both of my 9 speed cassettes, if I'm trying to keep the cadence up, then I'll pay more attention to when I choose to take that step thanks to the meter. I'd imagine HRM is probably argued as more of a health thing than a training thing with the Touring+, possibly enough people want to know which zone they are in and to moderate that through their ride more than they feel they need a box to tell them how fast they are pedalling. But that's just a guess.