Jody
Stubborn git
I used to DJ a bit,
Best £150 i've spent in years. Especially if you can't be doing with the space/hassle of actual decks
I used to DJ a bit,
Best £150 i've spent in years. Especially if you can't be doing with the space/hassle of actual decks
View attachment 681872
I've stopped doing it so much now but I had got to the point where I had roughly 30 or so songs both on vinyl and CD and a favourite trick was playing them simultaneously and switching between the 2 asking friends which sounded nicer, once they had decided I would invariably press eject on the CD player and congratulate them on choosing the analogue version. In order to do this it is imperative to have a decent Turntable/arm/cartridge set-up and an Amp with a good Phono stage, now I don't claim to have the best TT in the world but my Thorens TD166 with Rega arm is very good. It's not all about S/N ratios Analogue is simply a 'nicer' sound a lot of which is down to the way it is mastered. CD mastering often leaves a lot to be desired (google 'loudness wars' for a better idea of what is done) basically a lot of digital mastering does not take advantage of the dynamic range available, quiet passages are boosted and loud parts limited/compressed so everything sounds OKish on inexpensive mass market systems, this is not audiofoolary but documented fact. Some music is definitely better on CD, anything by Roger Waters for instance where he's going from whispered vocals to explosions then Vinyl cannot cope with the range as CD has a far lower 'noise floor'. That's why I will always have both formats hooked up to my QUAD.
I'd agree that the average person cannot really tell the difference but really that is due to the fact that they don't really have a system capable of resolving the quality of good recordings. The down side of this is I can hear how poorly some music is recorded on either format.
I've never tried mixing on anything else but I have to say I do love vinyl. It's a physical medium so you can touch it, manipulate it, you can see the music in the grooves.
That said, I don't have space for it so those might be fun. I've recently taken up guitar again though so any spare time I have available for music is taken up with that.
But ultimately it's down to preference and "better" includes other considerations like accessibility, cost, environment
Statement of the thread.
A lot of bollocks talked about quality of music, all wasted on me, ears diminished a long time ago, a mp3 sounds as good as a CD and vinyl to me, and a lot more convenient.
Statement of the thread.
A lot of bollocks talked about quality of music, all wasted on me, ears diminished a long time ago, a mp3 sounds as good as a CD and vinyl to me, and a lot more convenient.
I remember back in the day when i had a decent turntable,amp and speakers and going out and buying expensive speaker cable and trying to convince myself the sound was better than the cheaper stuff.Statement of the thread.
A lot of bollocks talked about quality of music, all wasted on me, ears diminished a long time ago, a mp3 sounds as good as a CD and vinyl to me, and a lot more convenient.
Same here, my ears are 71 years
Spotify also does this for you. Choose an artist and it will make a playlist of other artists that go well with it. Listen to an album of your choice and leave it running. It will pick things that go with it to play afterwards. I have discovered lots of new to me music this way
As has been said before, you can download on to your device and play without Internet. We pay £16.99 a month for a family subscription and there are 3 of us using it. It has 3 separate log ins so it doesn't lump all our musical tastes together.
My kids are both musicians. The bands they play in don't release physical cds any more but release new music via streaming services. It pays them bugger all unfortunately but physical cds cost a lot to produce and they wouldn't make any money from sales of those either (even if their fans were still buying)