SkipdiverJohn
Deplorable Brexiteer
- Location
- London
Fundamentally, your problem with weight is that you eat and drink too much in relation to the amount of activity you do to burn it all off. If you have to calm down the level of intensity of your cycling in order to avoid chest pains, then you are also going to have to cut down on your calorie intake unless you want to gain weight - which clearly you don't.
I don't really see how getting an e-bike is going to help matters. Yes, it will make a given speed of cycling less strenuous, but the assistance will also reduce the amount of energy you will expend cycling a given distance. Unless you greatly increase your cycling mileage to compensate for the lower workrate and/or dramatically change your food and drink intake you are not going to keep your weight down.
I'm only about a stone heavier than I'd like to be, and @ 3,500 calories a pound, just that much of excess fat means a stored surplus of roughly 50,000 calories needing to be burned off. To lose that purely by riding even my relatively heavy unassisted bikes, I would have to do a huge mileage and number of hours in the saddle, which is not realistic as I can't clock up miles by riding a bike to work because I have to carry tools & equipment around. In order to achieve some weight loss, I am having to make a conscious effort to drink slightly less beer and eat slightly less of all the tasty high-calorie foods, which is not easy to do because I enjoy food and beer and the social aspect that goes with it.
You made a remark in your post "I think I will always be fairly big" - as though you don't have any control over what weight you can achieve. Being inherently "big" only applies in so far as some people have heavier than average skeletons and/or they may be more muscular than average as a result of doing years of heavy manual work or weight training. Someone in those categories might well have a technically "overweight" BMI of maybe 26 or so and not be carrying any visible flab, but they are not going to be able to use that excuse to explain having a BMI of 27 or 28!
I don't really see how getting an e-bike is going to help matters. Yes, it will make a given speed of cycling less strenuous, but the assistance will also reduce the amount of energy you will expend cycling a given distance. Unless you greatly increase your cycling mileage to compensate for the lower workrate and/or dramatically change your food and drink intake you are not going to keep your weight down.
I'm only about a stone heavier than I'd like to be, and @ 3,500 calories a pound, just that much of excess fat means a stored surplus of roughly 50,000 calories needing to be burned off. To lose that purely by riding even my relatively heavy unassisted bikes, I would have to do a huge mileage and number of hours in the saddle, which is not realistic as I can't clock up miles by riding a bike to work because I have to carry tools & equipment around. In order to achieve some weight loss, I am having to make a conscious effort to drink slightly less beer and eat slightly less of all the tasty high-calorie foods, which is not easy to do because I enjoy food and beer and the social aspect that goes with it.
You made a remark in your post "I think I will always be fairly big" - as though you don't have any control over what weight you can achieve. Being inherently "big" only applies in so far as some people have heavier than average skeletons and/or they may be more muscular than average as a result of doing years of heavy manual work or weight training. Someone in those categories might well have a technically "overweight" BMI of maybe 26 or so and not be carrying any visible flab, but they are not going to be able to use that excuse to explain having a BMI of 27 or 28!