That actually answers my question that Accys thread begged: why aren't men taught prostate self examination? If men regularly palpated their own prostates (once a month after your period
), then they would be very alert to changes. This would probably be better than a GP. I am struck the the story of Chrissie Amphlet, who found something during breast self examination. A mammogram was clean, but she knew what her breasts felt like and was convinced something was wrong. She insisted on a biopsy. And, sadly, she was right. The cancer eventually killed her. I think men could get as familiar with their own prostates as she was with her breasts.
But I guess asking people to stick their own finger up their bum is a step too far.
Well, as
@PK99 's link suggests, it is difficult/not possible, but I take the point that men could/should be aware/encouraged to be more aware of symptoms of both prostate and testicular cancer (the latter being easier to self-examine for).
I don't have periods, so I can't do it after those, but men
can adopt an approach to doing things regularly. We can also be aware of the tendency to ignore symptoms, which many men do, for whatever reason.
My 'that's icky, accy' comment was simply meant to be a quip. I'm aware that both women and men (and all things in-between) have 'icky' personal issues to deal with. They're just a bit different from each other.
I'm reminded of something I learnt at school, many years ago, in a biology lesson. It was something like: there are only 4 distinct differences between men and women. Only women can gestate, lactate and menstruate. Only men can impregnate. In all other characteristics, both physical and psychological, there are crossovers. E.g. some women have hairier bodies/faces or are stronger than some men, but in general, men tend to be hairier/stronger (etc) Some men have larger breasts (etc) than some women, but in general, women tend to have larger ones.