Harry and Meghan

[Brains]

Harry and William especially are both very unattractive men and only have got decent looking women because of who they are full stop. Those women want them for their status and money, if they were on benefits they would be single.

You are correct.
However, women are always attached to power

 

[GrumpyGregry]

You are correct.
However, women are always attached to power

Are girlfriends electric?

 

[User10119]

You are correct.
However, women are always attached to power

For the record, I think the above statement is dismissive of an entire gender, stereotyped, inaccurate and intensely political.

 

[Fab Foodie]

Are girlfriends electric?

Mine’s eclectic....

 

[Fab Foodie]

[QUOTE 5059821, member: 10119"]For the record, I think the above statement is dismissive of an entire gender, stereotyped, inaccurate and intensely political.[/QUOTE]
You’re not alone.
The post that generated thst response falls into the same category.

Banish them both to PD ;-)

 

[Fnaar]

Mine’s eclectic....

Mine's a high quality latex according to the label on her neck

 

[Deleted member 26715]

[QUOTE 5059821, member: 10119"]For the record, I think the above statement is dismissive of an entire gender, stereotyped, inaccurate and intensely political.[/QUOTE]Although I agree with you, why would such an attractive young lady marry a man 50 years her senior, it certainly isn't for his looks.



Fabiana Ecclestone if you don't know who she is,

 

[Venod]

[QUOTE 5059821, member: 10119"]For the record, I think the above statement is dismissive of an entire gender, stereotyped, inaccurate and intensely political.[/QUOTE]

"beauty is in the eye of the beholder"

 

[Fab Foodie]

Mrs Merton/. “What was it that first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels”

 

[Fab Foodie]

Although I agree with you, why would such an attractive young lady marry a man 50 years her senior, it certainly isn't for his looks.

View attachment 385201

Fabiana Ecclestone if you don't know who she is,

Some people marry for money shocker....

 

[User10119]

Top bantz, n'est ce pas?

 

[MontyVeda]

...
I found this quite distasteful:
...

Quite! I didn't even know where to start addressing @User46386's post (so i didn't) ...especially the 'decent looking women' bit. WTF

 

[rich p]

You are correct.
However, women are always attached to power

Apart from being bollix, does it even make sense?

 

[User482]

[QUOTE 5059951, member: 10119"]Top bantz, n'est ce pas?[/QUOTE]
Fun and friendly, I thought.

 

[Electric_Andy]

Harry and William especially are both very unattractive men and only have got decent looking women because of who they are full stop. Those women want them for their status and money, if they were on benefits they would be single.

I disagree entirely. The way Meghan and Harry were looking at each other, they seemed to be very much in love. This world has enough negativity and generalisation in it without comments like this. Also, I don't think that either of the ladies were hard-up for cash before they met the Royals, so that aspect of your comment is not that believable either.