I think your reading to much in to it assuming anyone has an agendaThe joke was funny when Rosie Jones said it. Having it repeated a year later by pseudonymous men on the internet is just weird and creepy.
The joke was funny when Rosie Jones said it. Having it repeated a year later by pseudonymous men on the internet is just weird and creepy.
Was it Time-Trialling? Certainly a suitable hobby for any young person!I can't repeat it on here. But I wonder if she has discovered what Rosie Jones said she should be doing, on "The Last Leg"?
Her message is great.
Sadly, one doesn't need to dig too deep to find that she's as guilty as the rest of us.
The original joke did have an agenda as I interpret it. I'm not suggesting anyone on here does, just that it might be considered an inappropriate joke for a middle aged man to make about a teenage girl / young woman.I think your reading to much in to it assuming anyone has an agenda
Was it Time-Trialling? Certainly a suitable hobby for any young person!
But slightly less likely to bring benefits to billions of her fellow humans. Tough choice ...
The original joke did have an agenda as I interpret it. I'm not suggesting anyone on here does, just that it might be considered an inappropriate joke for a middle aged man to make about a teenage girl / young woman.
I had never heard of Rosie Jones, The Last Leg or this joke. I've now GoogledI can't repeat it on here. But I wonder if she has discovered what Rosie Jones said she should be doing, on "The Last Leg"?
First, the throat clearing, I'm all in favour of protecting the environment.
So, now that's out of the way, I feel very sorry for Thunberg, as I think her parents and handlers have shown a high degree of inconsideration for their daughters conditions, and have in fact fueled them for their own political ends, which in my eyes is a form of abuse. They have pushed her into a paranoid frenzy with the words they have given her to speak.
She rarely engages in debate, as when she does, her limitations are shown to the world, which implies she's being given the scripts to read out, and there have been several times when her dramatised version is not representative of the IPPC findings.
It comes across as a way of silencing debate, as being critical of what she says is seen as bullying, when she is actually a victim of her own side. I find it actually detrimental, as it deflects from the key issues when her prepared statements can be dissected and shown to contain factual errors and exaggerations, but most of all, it seems to be having a long term impact on her mental health.
I will no doubt now need a tin hat on for not worshiping at the church of Saint Greta, and instead having some consideration for her well being and a wish that the debates were more open.
You can actually read a full rebuttal, written by Greta herself of this supposed theory that she is being 'controlled, coerced, or abused' by her handlers.
It's just another deflecting move on behalf of those who would do her down.
Her mental health was far worse before she started with the activism - in part due to her despairing at the overall situation - a position I myself have found myself in often enough.
If you're all in favour of 'protecting the environmrnt' why not focus on doing that, instead of attacking the messenger, her mannerisms, or methodologies.
It's such a well worn cliche.