Giro helmets - huge appreciation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
another worthy post , a picture of someone in a tin foil hat is a worthy argument in your attempt to make me out to be foolish when deciding to wear a cycle helmet.

I await your next picture of a piece of fruit


You simply don't understand -do you?

You have put forward a chain of evidence, I have put forward an identical chain, simply a different helmet

Why is one "valid" but not the other?

As for the fruit - that was your silly justification, again all I have done is used your sill argument with a diferent intervention.

Again you really need to explain why one is valid, but not the other.
 
OP
OP
tigger

tigger

Über Member
If it is valid in promoting cycle helmet compulsion then we really need to seriously look at compulsory Thudguards!

The "elephant in the room" is the fact that the same organisations endorse cycle helmets and Thudguards.

No-one has yet been able to explain why their advice is sacrosanct in the former case but not in the latter

Do you wear a seat belt?
 

david k

Hi
Location
North West
You simply don't understand -do you?

You have put forward a chain of evidence, I have put forward an identical chain, simply a different helmet

Why is one "valid" but not the other?

As for the fruit - that was your silly justification, again all I have done is used your sill argument with a diferent intervention.

Again you really need to explain why one is valid, but not the other.



You expect people to explain to you why a piece of fruit would not make a valid cycle helmet? Worrying thing is you think it will but you dont thing a cycle helmet will
 
OP
OP
tigger

tigger

Über Member
You simply don't understand -do you?

You have put forward a chain of evidence, I have put forward an identical chain, simply a different helmet

Why is one "valid" but not the other?

As for the fruit - that was your silly justification, again all I have done is used your sill argument with a diferent intervention.

Again you really need to explain why one is valid, but not the other.

Why are you comparing a foil hat to a cycling one? How old are you?
 
just a load of waffle, is it valid or not

Try again?

Let me break this down, and make the question very, very simple for you?

In your experience and knowledge, doyou think that advising the use of cycle helmets by the College of Emergency Medicine and RoSpa is valid and should be observed or not?
 

david k

Hi
Location
North West
Try again?

Let me break this down, and make the question very, very simple for you?

In your experience and knowledge, doyou think that advising the use of cycle helmets by the College of Emergency Medicine and RoSpa is valid and should be observed or not?



why wont you answer the question, it really is simple, is it valid or not, or you deciding to be selective again?
 
You expect people to explain to you why a piece of fruit would not make a valid cycle helmet? Worrying thing is you think it will but you dont thing a cycle helmet will


Dear, oh dear...

You really are not doing well are you?

Your ridiculous claim was that banging your head against a wall wearing a helmet hurt less than without, I pointed out that a canteloupe provided the same level of decrease in pain

No-one suggested they replaced cycle helmets, just that your silly experiment was deeply flawed and colud be used to prove fruit reduced pain.

Please reassure me that you do realise this attempt to justify helmet compulsion was really very silly
 
OP
OP
tigger

tigger

Über Member
So here we are, 30 odd pages into the hijack of my niave post.

What have I learned? Helmet compulsion is a very emotive subject... I think thats about it? :whistle:
 

david k

Hi
Location
North West
Dear, oh dear...

You really are not doing well are you?

Your ridiculous claim was that banging your head against a wall wearing a helmet hurt less than without, I pointed out that a canteloupe provided the same level of decrease in pain

No-one suggested they replaced cycle helmets, just that your silly experiment was deeply flawed and colud be used to prove fruit reduced pain.

Please reassure me that you do realise this attempt to justify helmet compulsion was really very silly

LMAO, you are really mixed up with this whole thing aren't you. Your claim that a piece of fruit reduced pain and therefore is just as good as a cycle helmet is laughable and ridiculous. Your attempts to persuade me a helmet offers no benefit is to judge against tin foil hats and pieces of fruit, how can anyone take you seriously?


I never claimed it to justify helmet compulsion ever and you suggesting it was is yet again another laughable attempt to muddy the water.

Now, if your serious about your claim of fruit reducing pain , try out your experiment, if not how can you claim it will?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom