another worthy post , a picture of someone in a tin foil hat is a worthy argument in your attempt to make me out to be foolish when deciding to wear a cycle helmet.
I await your next picture of a piece of fruit
You simply don't understand -do you?
You have put forward a chain of evidence, I have put forward an identical chain, simply a different helmet
Why is one "valid" but not the other?
As for the fruit - that was your silly justification, again all I have done is used your sill argument with a diferent intervention.
Again you really need to explain why one is valid, but not the other.