Who didn't??They didn't have their data released by the Fancy Bears
Who didn't??They didn't have their data released by the Fancy Bears
Prisoner of the People's Republic of Judea?I think Fancy bears have released things in the past. Cancellara springs to mind,I maybe wrong though.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/cancellara-cummings-fuglsang-featured-in-latest-fancy-bears-leak/You could be right. I know Laura Trott's TUE for salbutamol was released, which surprised no one at all. Mo Farah was another. I'll have a search.
Edit... Yup, Cancellara too
Didn't SKY lose most of the evidence that was asked for?A serious lack of hand signals from SirDave's PR bods:
https://www.teamsky.com/article/team-sky-response-to-comments-by-uci-president-david-lappartient
Maybe not, but should we sent a precedent that teams who have been hacked have to answer questions, those who are not hacked are free to abuse TUEs?
Moi? D’ya know, I’d completely forgotten about the MPCC. They do those blue rubber wrist-band thingies, right?Members of the MPCC you cynic. Well they were while it suited them....
Moi? D’ya know, I’d completely forgotten about the MPCC. They do those blue rubber wrist-band thingies, right?
That's an interesting idea. I was wondering if they were after even more power to appoint directors, viewing UK Sport's new power to be involved in the appointment process (part of the Code for Sports Governance) as insufficient.Their findings have no legal weight within the sport but may affect future funding of the sport in the UK. A cynic might wonder if they were predisposed to find evidence of wrongdoing in order to justify spending cuts.
even though UKAD have done that and found no wrong doing?? in team sky that isIt's really up to the UCI and/or WADA to investigate the matter of TUE abuse properly, and to investigate all teams. And then take action if necessary.
That's an interesting idea. I was wondering if they were after even more power to appoint directors, viewing UK Sport's new power to be involved in the appointment process (part of the Code for Sports Governance) as insufficient.
even though UKAD have done that and found no wrong doing?? in team sky that is
pretty sure they investigated a lot more than just the jiffy bag and why would you investigate a TUE?UKAD's investigation was into allegations that Wiggo used triamcinolone in competition, at the 2012 Dauphiné (the contents of the mysterious jiffy bag).
They have not investigated his TUE for use of triamcinolone out of competition and whether or not it was medically justified.
pretty sure they investigated a lot more than just the jiffy bag
why would you investigate a TUE?