Froome and Wiggins TUEs

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Adam4868

Guru
Wiggins ill give the benefit of doubt,Froome nah ive got no doubt,im convinced hes clean.To say he was shite early on was maybe a overstatement.I dont.see any reason to doubt him other than his winning.so ill stick with that.
 

SheilaH

Guest
Well, now they've decided not to take things any further the case file is passed to us, the shouty opinionated internet people, to air our opinions.

And you know what they say about opinions.

Not quite.

The DCMS has yet to report...
 

Doseone

Guru
Location
Brecon
There is a very good podcast on the cyclingnews website which really spells it out.

Thank you for that - I've given it a listen (with the exception of the last 4 minutes, which I'll listen to a bit later) and it is very good. My own opinion is that Sky have absolutely (ab)used TUE's as one of their methods of "marginal" gains. So, that leaves Sky's reputation pretty much in tatters, but they probably don't care.

Listening to the podcast though, I didn't like Jeremy Whittle. You could almost hear the glee in his voice and it felt to me like he may be settling a personal vendetta here. That's not to diminish what's happened, but Whittle seemed to want this to be on a par with Puerto or Cofidis, and it isn't.
 
Thank you for that - I've given it a listen (with the exception of the last 4 minutes, which I'll listen to a bit later) and it is very good. My own opinion is that Sky have absolutely (ab)used TUE's as one of their methods of "marginal" gains. So, that leaves Sky's reputation pretty much in tatters, but they probably don't care.

Listening to the podcast though, I didn't like Jeremy Whittle. You could almost hear the glee in his voice and it felt to me like he may be settling a personal vendetta here. That's not to diminish what's happened, but Whittle seemed to want this to be on a par with Puerto or Cofidis, and it isn't.
Here's a link highlighting the "tactical use" of TUEs and "recovery":
http://data.parliament.uk/writtenev...combatting-doping-in-sport/written/69004.html

Edit - and a BBC report from today, with Shane Sutton confirming the above:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/42033692
 
Last edited:

Adam4868

Guru
Its bad when David Miller is dissapointed ! Read that earlier,have they done anything illegal ? Its debatable i guess but we probally know more about marginal gains now.
 

coldash

Veteran
It will be interesting to see how many of the facts can be verified in the whistleblower note. I don’t know and will wait for more info. IMV, I’m sure that TUEs do get used tactically to get a rider back up to 100% by most teams. Using them to get beyond that crosses the line for me. I watched the evidence live and didn’t strike me that Cope was “an unwitting porn” ( sic), although he was clearly desperate to keep his job.

Also interesting to see the whistleblower highlight the link between Fabio Bartolucci and Nicole Cooke. Hmmm
 
Its irrelevant. How does he account for the lack of results before he contracted bilharzia?

If it was bilharzia holding him back whilst at Sky in 2010, why wasn't he a world beater before he contracted It?

he was only diagnosed with it in 2009, who knows how long he had it before it was diagnosed.

as far as wiggins and froome are concerned ,I am prepared to accept that they acted within the rules, but, I think both , and everyone else at sky have pushed tue,s to the absolute limit,but as stated the tue,s were sanctioned, therefore legal, morally however is a different thing. I don't think for one minute sky are the only ones doing it.

and to play devils advocate ... what did you say mr wiggins ..you have terrible hay fever , tough sh!t, its not a good idea to race through france at the height of summer then.....good bye,.... shut the door on your way out,... same goes for everybody.
 
Top Bottom